Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vq5s9u$1irtp$3@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid
 rebuttals
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 22:33:19 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <vq5s9u$1irtp$3@dont-email.me>
References: <vq5qqc$1j128$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 04:33:18 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="78d928a9a400af2e1a99aa5e831e2fe9";
	logging-data="1667001"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/T99LjO7BFDL3fEfojHaPO"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PsTUSnFNbYC/rnLogiF0FSMETJc=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vq5qqc$1j128$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2406

On 3/3/2025 10:07 PM, olcott wrote:
> int DD()
> {
>    int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
>    if (Halt_Status)
>      HERE: goto HERE;
>    return Halt_Status;
> }
> 
> _DD()
> [00002133] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
> [00002134] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
> [00002136] 51         push ecx      ; make space for local
> [00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD
> [0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD)
> [00002141] 83c404     add esp,+04
> [00002144] 8945fc     mov [ebp-04],eax
> [00002147] 837dfc00   cmp dword [ebp-04],+00
> [0000214b] 7402       jz 0000214f
> [0000214d] ebfe       jmp 0000214d
> [0000214f] 8b45fc     mov eax,[ebp-04]
> [00002152] 8be5       mov esp,ebp
> [00002154] 5d         pop ebp
> [00002155] c3         ret
> Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155]
> 
> DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly
> reach its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally.
> 
> The only valid rebuttal is to show all of the steps of
> exactly how DD correctly emulated by HHH reaches its
> own "ret" instruction.
> 

Suppose we accept that HHH is able to correctly determine that replacing 
the code of HHH with an unconditional simulator and running HHH(DD) will 
not halt.

Then what?