Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vq6fgj$1pt47$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: Security fasteners Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 02:01:05 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 31 Message-ID: <vq6fgj$1pt47$2@dont-email.me> References: <vq68c3$1p096$1@dont-email.me> <1r8nwrf.1f4hcwebwz608N%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 10:01:07 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="16a65e28050da4e8b9e8417bdb348229"; logging-data="1897607"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+3XgHFqfgCEw5Z6UdUK+2I" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:gnniJRHwjOwep0gvH35zJDbxkek= In-Reply-To: <1r8nwrf.1f4hcwebwz608N%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2233 On 3/4/2025 1:27 AM, Liz Tuddenham wrote: > Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote: > >> What value "security fasteners"? One can purchase "drivers" >> for damn near any of them, cheap. >> >> Is the intent to discourage *casual* disassembly (given that >> anyone determined to do so can purchase same)? Perhaps to >> be able to argue (in a court of law) that the other party >> took "extraordinary measures" to gain access to the internals >> of your product (so, if he was injured in the process, it >> shouldn't fall on your shoulders) >> >> Or, the hope of *actually* preventing disassembly? >> >> I.e., wouldn't a tamper-proof "seal" be cheaper and more >> conclusive? > > In the UK, the seals are now designated "Tamper Evident" - which is more > accurate. Yes, that is likely the designation, here, as well. Note that even they (at least adhesive ones) aren't "tamper proof" *or* "evident" as one can remove all traces of the seal and REPLACE it with another, identical, mass produced seal. (This is why holographic seals have been used)