Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Copyright for "simulating halt decider" by Olcott for many years
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 12:29:58 +0200
Organization: -
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <vq6kn6$1r0hn$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vptlfu$3st19$9@dont-email.me> <vpug3h$50td$1@dont-email.me> <vq06al$eljf$1@dont-email.me> <vq06ja$dfve$2@dont-email.me> <vq075c$eljf$3@dont-email.me> <vq08gi$f06n$1@dont-email.me> <vq0b4u$f3k3$4@dont-email.me> <vq0crn$fhth$2@dont-email.me> <vq0dl2$f3k3$10@dont-email.me> <3hg7sjhnq962dnkue9cg8ftccfbsf7rpfd@4ax.com> <fbc1c3d5507d1d175bdadbbfde51c10bdda1b437@i2pn2.org> <vq19ae$nkcf$1@dont-email.me> <vq1pbq$q7t4$1@dont-email.me> <vq48jl$1agmv$1@dont-email.me> <vq50k5$1ev4u$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 11:29:59 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7e56ab57382a496fff06f6363741e829";
	logging-data="1933879"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18lYoNQdZKeUeh4BRFegpH7"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:xAT1WqXX09m9q7xgKMzEjVO+ILM=
Bytes: 2561

On 2025-03-03 19:40:53 +0000, olcott said:

> On 3/3/2025 6:51 AM, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2025-03-02 14:18:35 +0000, olcott said:
>> 
>>> On 3/2/2025 3:44 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>> On 2025-03-02 07:45:26 +0000, joes said:
>>>> 
>>>>> Am Sun, 02 Mar 2025 02:28:14 +0000 schrieb Mr Flibble:
>>>>>> Stop stealing my idea: it is Copyright 2022 Mr Flibble.
>>>>> May I note that useless or wrong ideas are not patentable.
>>>> 
>>>> No patent was claimed, only copyright. But copyright does not protect ideas,
>>>> only particular presentations of those ideas, to some extent.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> For example the term "simulating halt decider" and
>>> "simulating termination analyzer" have been copyrighted
>>> by me for many years. I do this to establish academic
>>> credit for these underlying ideas.
>> 
>> Academic credit is not connected to copyrights. Submission and
>> publication dates have some significance. Most important are
>> references by others.
> 
> The copyright notice indicates that one is not
> merely referring to the work of others.

No, it does not. I have seen copyright notices and references to work of
others in the same opus.

-- 
Mikko