| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vq6u3o$1sjs4$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho Subject: Re: For Binky ( Only paedophiles would use such word to indicate pride in child molestation) ... Bible Studies Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 00:10:27 +1100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 72 Message-ID: <vq6u3o$1sjs4$1@dont-email.me> References: <vpuu73$7fn6$1@dont-email.me> <vq1h7k$p0gs$1@dont-email.me> <1AZwP.68485$Kb9a.37274@fx16.ams4> <vq4a8m$1aqbr$1@dont-email.me> <vq4dfa$11cd$11@gallifrey.nk.ca> <vq6pgi$1rrio$1@dont-email.me> <JjCxP.13064$Yqb6.7926@fx05.ams4> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 14:10:16 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="13b99e98f485c3408edd5a9d3739cf6f"; logging-data="1986436"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18sOLtZCr2kazgNREgWx3DL" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20 Cancel-Lock: sha1:+OWz94y146pjMr8qaiVqAQZZsnI= X-Antivirus-Status: Clean In-Reply-To: <JjCxP.13064$Yqb6.7926@fx05.ams4> X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 250304-2, 3/4/2025), Outbound message Bytes: 4298 On 4/03/2025 11:26 pm, Hornplayer9599 wrote: > On 3/4/2025 05:51, Daniel70 wrote: >> On 4/03/2025 1:14 am, The Doctor wrote: >>> In article <vq4a8m$1aqbr$1@dont-email.me>, >>> Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote: >>>> On 3/03/2025 1:04 am, Hornplayer9599 wrote: >>>>> On 3/2/2025 05:59, Daniel70 wrote: >>>>>> On 2/03/2025 12:51 am, The Doctor wrote: >>>> >>>> <Snip> >>>> >>>>>>> Make that Luke 6:37-42 >>>>>> >>>>>> Maybe "they" read that much extra in YOUR Church, Binky, (Heavens >>>>>> KNOWS YOUR lot seem to be a wayward lot .... if YOU, Binky, are an >>>>>> example!!), but in MY Church, we ONLY needed Luke 6, 39-45. >>>>>> >>>>>>> Matthew 7:7-20 >>>>>>> Luke 6:43-45 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Luke 6:37-42 >>>>>> >>>>>> So WHICH is it, Binky?? Luke 6, 37-42 or Luke 6, 43-45?? Or are YOUR >>>>>> lot such prolific SINNERS that you need extra guidance?? >>>>>> >>>>>>> Judging Others >>>>>>> Mt 7:1-5 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 37 (Mk 11:25; Eph 4:32) "Judge not, and you shall not be judged. >>>>>>> Condemn not, and you will not be condemned. >>>>>>> Forgive, and you shall be forgiven. >>>>>>> 38 (Ps 79:12; Mk 4:24) Give, and it will be given to you: >>>>>>> Good measure, pressed down, shaken together, and running over >>>>>>> will men give unto you. For with the measure you use, >>>>>>> it will be measured unto you." >>>>>>> 39 (Mt 15:14) He spoke a parable to them: "Can the blind lead the >>>>>>> blind? >>>>>>> Will they not both fall into the ditch? >>>>>>> 40 (Jn 13:16; 15:20) The disciple is not above his teacher, >>>>>>> but everyone who is trained will be like his teacher. >>>>>>> 41 (Jn 8:7) "Why do you see the speck that is in your brother's eye, >>>>>>> but do not see the beam that is in your own eye? >>>>>>> 42 How can you say to your brother, 'Brother, let me remove the >>>>>>> speck >>>>>>> that is in your eye,' when you yourself do not see the beam >>>>>>> that is in your own eye? You hypocrite! >>>>>>> First remove the beam from your own eye, >>>>>>> and then you will see clearly to remove the speck >>>>>>> that is in your brother's eye. >>>>>> >>>>>> So, Binky, what about YOUR answers to my Question, Binky?? >>> ^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted! >>>>> >>>>> Since he's so apt at deflection, let's save some time and ask him >>>>> about >>>>> Exodus 20:16 specifically. >>> >>> And yet you left out the 10 commandments. >>> >>>> "apt at deflection" ..... shouldn't that require us NOT noticing he's >>>> having changed the topic of discussion?? >>> >>> Do quote from correct sources and not corrupt sources. >> >> But I DON'T want to know what a SOURCE states, I want to know WHAT YOU >> think!! > > Well, there's where you went wrong....you asked Dave to THINK! > Ah!! Sorry! ;-P -- Daniel70