Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vq6u3o$1sjs4$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: For Binky ( Only paedophiles would use such word to indicate
 pride in child molestation) ... Bible Studies
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 00:10:27 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 72
Message-ID: <vq6u3o$1sjs4$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vpuu73$7fn6$1@dont-email.me> <vq1h7k$p0gs$1@dont-email.me>
 <1AZwP.68485$Kb9a.37274@fx16.ams4> <vq4a8m$1aqbr$1@dont-email.me>
 <vq4dfa$11cd$11@gallifrey.nk.ca> <vq6pgi$1rrio$1@dont-email.me>
 <JjCxP.13064$Yqb6.7926@fx05.ams4>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 14:10:16 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="13b99e98f485c3408edd5a9d3739cf6f";
	logging-data="1986436"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18sOLtZCr2kazgNREgWx3DL"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+OWz94y146pjMr8qaiVqAQZZsnI=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
In-Reply-To: <JjCxP.13064$Yqb6.7926@fx05.ams4>
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 250304-2, 3/4/2025), Outbound message
Bytes: 4298

On 4/03/2025 11:26 pm, Hornplayer9599 wrote:
> On 3/4/2025 05:51, Daniel70 wrote:
>> On 4/03/2025 1:14 am, The Doctor wrote:
>>> In article <vq4a8m$1aqbr$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> Daniel70  <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
>>>> On 3/03/2025 1:04 am, Hornplayer9599 wrote:
>>>>> On 3/2/2025 05:59, Daniel70 wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/03/2025 12:51 am, The Doctor wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <Snip>
>>>>
>>>>>>> Make that Luke 6:37-42
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe "they" read that much extra in YOUR Church, Binky, (Heavens
>>>>>> KNOWS YOUR lot seem to be a wayward lot .... if YOU, Binky, are an
>>>>>> example!!), but in MY Church, we ONLY needed Luke 6, 39-45.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Matthew 7:7-20
>>>>>>> Luke 6:43-45
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Luke 6:37-42
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So WHICH is it, Binky?? Luke 6, 37-42 or Luke 6, 43-45?? Or are YOUR
>>>>>> lot such prolific SINNERS that you need extra guidance??
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Judging Others
>>>>>>> Mt 7:1-5
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 37 (Mk 11:25; Eph 4:32) "Judge not, and you shall not be judged.
>>>>>>> Condemn not, and you will not be condemned.
>>>>>>> Forgive, and you shall be forgiven.
>>>>>>> 38 (Ps 79:12; Mk 4:24) Give, and it will be given to you:
>>>>>>> Good measure, pressed down, shaken together, and running over
>>>>>>> will men give unto you. For with the measure you use,
>>>>>>> it will be measured unto you."
>>>>>>> 39 (Mt 15:14) He spoke a parable to them: "Can the blind lead the 
>>>>>>> blind?
>>>>>>> Will they not both fall into the ditch?
>>>>>>> 40 (Jn 13:16; 15:20) The disciple is not above his teacher,
>>>>>>> but everyone who is trained will be like his teacher.
>>>>>>> 41 (Jn 8:7) "Why do you see the speck that is in your brother's eye,
>>>>>>> but do not see the beam that is in your own eye?
>>>>>>> 42 How can you say to your brother, 'Brother, let me remove the 
>>>>>>> speck
>>>>>>> that is in your eye,' when you yourself do not see the beam
>>>>>>> that is in your own eye? You hypocrite!
>>>>>>> First remove the beam from your own eye,
>>>>>>> and then you will see clearly to remove the speck
>>>>>>> that is in your brother's eye.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, Binky, what about YOUR answers to my Question, Binky??
>>>          ^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted!
>>>>>
>>>>> Since he's so apt at deflection, let's save some time and ask him 
>>>>> about
>>>>> Exodus 20:16 specifically.
>>>
>>> And yet you left out the 10 commandments.
>>>
>>>> "apt at deflection" ..... shouldn't that require us NOT noticing he's
>>>> having changed the topic of discussion??
>>>
>>> Do quote from correct sources and not corrupt sources.
>>
>> But I DON'T want to know what a SOURCE states, I want to know WHAT YOU 
>> think!!
> 
> Well, there's where you went wrong....you asked Dave to THINK!
> 
Ah!! Sorry! ;-P
-- 
Daniel70