Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid
 rebuttals
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 11:21:14 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <vq799p$1sgf7$3@dont-email.me>
References: <vq5qqc$1j128$2@dont-email.me>
 <vq6jam$1qp5e$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vq729j$1tapm$2@dont-email.me>
 <b36a796cf1fbda692a37c664df66c22b6d7807c6@i2pn2.org>
 <vq7941$1u8bl$4@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 17:21:13 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="78d928a9a400af2e1a99aa5e831e2fe9";
	logging-data="1982951"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/QOAyU70VeJRQ83fJ0TlQ7"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:EHjorJ94TTZJH8NYrENpnyPZDMw=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vq7941$1u8bl$4@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2349

On 3/4/2025 11:18 AM, olcott wrote:
> On 3/4/2025 9:38 AM, joes wrote:
>> Am Tue, 04 Mar 2025 08:21:39 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>> On 3/4/2025 4:06 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:
>>>> Am 04.03.2025 um 04:07 schrieb olcott:
>>
>>>>> DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own "ret"
>>>>> instruction and terminate normally.
>>>>> The only valid rebuttal is to show all of the steps of exactly how DD
>>>>> correctly emulated by HHH reaches its own "ret" instruction.
>>>> You're wrong; your program will never stop - like your halting problem
>>>> investigations.
> 
>>> I am not wrong and no one can show that I wrong
>>> The only valid rebuttal is to show all of the steps of exactly how DD
>>> correctly emulated by HHH reaches its own "ret" instruction. NO ONE CAN
>>> DO THAT BECAUSE I AM CORRECT
>> Cool. Now that you've made your point, would you please shut up?
>>
> 
> Agree that I am correct or prove that I am wrong.
> I MUST HAVE CLOSURE!!!
> 


Assuming that we agree that, as you stated, that changing the code of 
HHH  to an unconditional simulator and running HHH(DD) does not halt, 
then what?