Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vq7hh0$206gl$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: JAB <here@is.invalid> Newsgroups: sci.misc Subject: Re: advance towards green hydrogen Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 12:41:36 -0600 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 11 Message-ID: <vq7hh0$206gl$2@dont-email.me> References: <67bbeaf7$1$17$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <vpni3d$2ld7n$1@dont-email.me> <20250226201004.589e6d784d9ad882d35ea669@127.0.0.1> <vpprr6$350p0$1@dont-email.me> <2969fe4b-3f8f-e414-9446-bf98c77cbc5b@example.net> Reply-To: JAB <here@is.invalid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 19:41:37 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c22338b0f81def7ce61dd12bc4225a27"; logging-data="2103829"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Yw7cOkXauTp6GSgBPDqTC" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:azO6vjIqzgFyieUABG54KuaeATo= Bytes: 1572 On Sat, 1 Mar 2025 11:58:31 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote: >Long term storage of hydrogen is difficult. Presently available storage options typically require large-volume systems that store hydrogen in gaseous form. This is less of an issue for stationary applications, where the footprint of compressed gas tanks may be less critical. https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/hydrogen-storage