Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vq801d$22jsc$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Brian G. Lucas" <bagel99@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: PC/IX, not, Why VAX Was the Ultimate CISC and Not RISC
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 17:51:11 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <vq801d$22jsc$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vpufbv$4qc5$1@dont-email.me> <vq4jrl$1cguk$1@dont-email.me>
 <vq5nc0$lob$1@gal.iecc.com> <vq7alc$1ukpf$1@dont-email.me>
 <vq7pmb$1jkc$1@gal.iecc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 23:49:18 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="97a6badffad19edb6a9de182c0370cde";
	logging-data="2183052"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19iWqSkRr2T/sy2keKMaQrA"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+Lv0sXmBu+DnY8PvOSjXur06fZE=
In-Reply-To: <vq7pmb$1jkc$1@gal.iecc.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2300

On 3/4/25 4:00 PM, John Levine wrote:
> According to Brian G. Lucas <bagel99@gmail.com>:
>>> Nobody knew what the market for PC/IX was supposed to be beyond some
>>> handwaving "if 5% if PC users buy it we'll be rich."  PC/IX could do
>>> anything a PDP-11 running Unix could do, give or take peripherals,
>>> but the PC market was very different from the PDP-11 market and by
>>> that time the PDP-11 was rather long in the tooth.
>>>
>> Maybe everyting except for lack of memory protection.
>> IBM sold it as a single user system.
> 
> The lack of memory protection turned out not to matter very much. Didn't we once
> get a bug report for something that only failed after the system had been up
> continuously for a year?
> 
I don't remember that one.

> It didn't help that PC/IX and Unix in general had very few applications for
> non-technical users. There was document processing with nroff and troff, with
> our INed screen editor, but what else?
> 
Which is kinda ironic since Unix was originally funded to be used by 
"secretaries" in the Bell Labs patent department.  But you are correct,
Unix was mostly used by programmers.