| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vq81l2$232tl$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers,comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: The joy of FORTRAN Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 23:16:50 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 15 Message-ID: <vq81l2$232tl$2@dont-email.me> References: <5mqdnZuGq4lgwm_7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <vq52ov$1f9re$3@dont-email.me> <vq55if$7ae$1@reader1.panix.com> <vq6g9q$1q495$6@dont-email.me> <vq6rgf$fi5$1@reader1.panix.com> <vq71te$1t6uf$3@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2025 00:16:51 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ccde15c8b30be8b462a3deae2fb7e66d"; logging-data="2198453"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+eARzqnSrk5H8wgGXLOawF" User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk) Cancel-Lock: sha1:iCjEFp0NtmT8YsvLj+Ctu9GM7E0= Bytes: 1747 On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 14:15:10 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> There are other ways of doing that that do not involve passing 60 >> parameters into a single function call. >> > Yes, but they are even clunkier Typically you would find those values travel around in groups, which makes it natural to put them together in a struct. Or alternatively, they could be 60 separate data channels collecting similar kinds of information, which points to the use of an array. The idea of 60 independent values of 60 different types coming together from 60 separate random origins just strikes me as ... unlikely.