| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vq8l8s$29b9l$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid
rebuttals
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 22:51:40 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 62
Message-ID: <vq8l8s$29b9l$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vq5qqc$1j128$2@dont-email.me> <vq6g9l$1ptg9$2@dont-email.me>
<vq722k$1tapm$1@dont-email.me>
<ed3da24ad779b64f33f92d6327f2ccbb14451730@i2pn2.org>
<vq86fn$23nt0$2@dont-email.me>
<20ee9fcf5d4f3613513d9e3639df01986e79ae7e@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2025 05:51:41 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a03081617d28bac14ed375682a08b36d";
logging-data="2403637"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18x/mMPGPPf0RiB1EeB1V8T"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:rZtSXvKGn1vcH3f8Gf2W11YwsxM=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <20ee9fcf5d4f3613513d9e3639df01986e79ae7e@i2pn2.org>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250304-10, 3/4/2025), Outbound message
Bytes: 3712
On 3/4/2025 10:44 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 3/4/25 7:39 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 3/4/2025 5:45 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 3/4/25 9:17 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 3/4/2025 3:14 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>> Op 04.mrt.2025 om 04:07 schreef olcott:
>>>>>> int DD()
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
>>>>>> if (Halt_Status)
>>>>>> HERE: goto HERE;
>>>>>> return Halt_Status;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _DD()
>>>>>> [00002133] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping
>>>>>> [00002134] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping
>>>>>> [00002136] 51 push ecx ; make space for local
>>>>>> [00002137] 6833210000 push 00002133 ; push DD
>>>>>> [0000213c] e882f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DD)
>>>>>> [00002141] 83c404 add esp,+04
>>>>>> [00002144] 8945fc mov [ebp-04],eax
>>>>>> [00002147] 837dfc00 cmp dword [ebp-04],+00
>>>>>> [0000214b] 7402 jz 0000214f
>>>>>> [0000214d] ebfe jmp 0000214d
>>>>>> [0000214f] 8b45fc mov eax,[ebp-04]
>>>>>> [00002152] 8be5 mov esp,ebp
>>>>>> [00002154] 5d pop ebp
>>>>>> [00002155] c3 ret
>>>>>> Size in bytes:(0035) [00002155]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly
>>>>>> reach its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally.
>>>>> I wonder why Olcott keeps repeating that HHH fails to reach the
>>>>> 'ret' instruction, where the direct execution or world-class
>>>>> simulators have no problem to reach the 'ret' instruction of
>>>>> exactly the same finite string as input.
>>>>
>>>> The only valid rebuttal is to show all of the steps of
>>>> exactly how DD correctly emulated by HHH reaches its
>>>> own "ret" instruction.
>>>
>>> No,
>>
>> Meaning:
>> (a) You don't have a clue how to do this all of your
>> rebuttals have been pure bluster with zero technical
>> competence behind them.
>>
>> (b) You know that I am correct and are simply lying.
>>
>
> Nope, it just proves that
Dodging this point is your only rebuttal to it:
DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach
its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally.
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer