Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid
 rebuttals ---PSR---
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 15:37:30 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 75
Message-ID: <vqag6q$2jief$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vq5qqc$1j128$2@dont-email.me> <vq6g9l$1ptg9$2@dont-email.me>
 <vq722k$1tapm$1@dont-email.me> <vq751g$1t7oc$1@dont-email.me>
 <vq78ni$1u8bl$3@dont-email.me>
 <5e786c32c2dcc88be50183203781dcb6a5d8d046@i2pn2.org>
 <vq866t$23nt0$1@dont-email.me>
 <2002d599ebdfb7cd5a023881ab2faca9801b219d@i2pn2.org>
 <vq8l3d$29b9l$1@dont-email.me>
 <4426787ad065bfd0939e10b937f3b8b2798d0578@i2pn2.org>
 <vq8mam$29b9l$5@dont-email.me>
 <920b573567d204a5c792425b09097d79ee098fa5@i2pn2.org>
 <vq9lvn$2ei4j$3@dont-email.me>
 <4453bc0c1141c540852ea2223a7fedefc93f564c@i2pn2.org>
 <vqadoh$2ivg7$2@dont-email.me> <vqae74$2ivcn$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2025 22:37:36 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7f021bee4d8adfd642b94f04007e3dd0";
	logging-data="2738639"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/58Cz6cU+edhF83kb2hCQi"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:dkQ7lv17kU1jqRZHVMoIt6QLlSc=
In-Reply-To: <vqae74$2ivcn$1@dont-email.me>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250305-8, 3/5/2025), Outbound message
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 5024

On 3/5/2025 3:03 PM, dbush wrote:
> On 3/5/2025 3:55 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 3/5/2025 10:14 AM, joes wrote:
>>> Am Wed, 05 Mar 2025 08:10:00 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>>> On 3/5/2025 6:19 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> On 3/5/25 12:09 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/4/2025 11:07 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>> On 3/4/25 11:48 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 3/4/2025 10:44 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 3/4/25 7:34 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 3/4/2025 5:45 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/4/25 11:11 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/4/2025 9:08 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Op 04.mrt.2025 om 15:17 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/4/2025 3:14 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Op 04.mrt.2025 om 04:07 schreef olcott:
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, my claim remains: HHH fails to reach the 'ret' 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> instruction,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> where the direct execution and some world-class simulators 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>> no problem to reach it.
>>>>>>>>>>>> DD calls its own emulator when emulated by HHH.
>>>>>>>>>>>> DD DOES NOT call its own emulator when emulated by HHH1. DD 
>>>>>>>>>>>> DOES
>>>>>>>>>>>> NOT call its own emulator when directly executed.
>>>>>>>>>>> Which just show your stupidity, as DD doesn't HAVE its own
>>>>>>>>>>> emulator, and CAN'T know who or if it is being emulated.
>>>>>>>>>> It is not my stupidity it is your dishonestly using the straw-man
>>>>>>>>>> deception to change the subject away from:
>>>>>>>>>> DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own "ret"
>>>>>>>>>> instruction and terminate normally.
>>>>>>>>> WHich is the strawman, that you are too stupid to recogines.
>>>>>>>> I will show that it is not straw-man after you quit dodging that
>>>>>>>> point.
>>>>>>> Wrong order,
>>>>>> I WILL NOT TOLERATE ANY OTHER ORDER
>>>>> In other words, you CAN'T handle any other order, even though 
>>>>> logically
>>>>> requried, because you need to hide your fraud.
>>>> My proof requires a specific  prerequisite order.
>>>> One cannot learn algebra before one has learned to count to ten.
>>>> DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own "ret"
>>>> instruction and terminate normally.
>>>> Is the first step of the mandatory prerequisite order of my proof
>>> What is the next step?
>>>
>>
>> *DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach*
>> *its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally*
>>
>> It has taken two years to create this first step such that it
>> is the the simplest way to state the key element of the
>> whole proof and make this element impossible to correctly refute.
>>
>> EVERY ATTEMPT TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT AWAY FROM THIS POINT
>> IS DISHONEST.
>>
> 
> Before agreeing on an answer, it is first required to agree on the 
> question.

*DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach*
*its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally*

This is irrefutable. Every attempt to show otherwise
has been a change of subject.

Until we have mutual agreement on that key most
important point upon which all other points depend
this point will be repeated.

-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer