Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid
 rebuttals ---PSR---
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 18:26:03 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 95
Message-ID: <vqaq2s$2lgq7$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vq5qqc$1j128$2@dont-email.me> <vq6g9l$1ptg9$2@dont-email.me>
 <vq722k$1tapm$1@dont-email.me> <vq751g$1t7oc$1@dont-email.me>
 <vq78ni$1u8bl$3@dont-email.me>
 <5e786c32c2dcc88be50183203781dcb6a5d8d046@i2pn2.org>
 <vq866t$23nt0$1@dont-email.me>
 <2002d599ebdfb7cd5a023881ab2faca9801b219d@i2pn2.org>
 <vq8l3d$29b9l$1@dont-email.me>
 <4426787ad065bfd0939e10b937f3b8b2798d0578@i2pn2.org>
 <vq8mam$29b9l$5@dont-email.me>
 <920b573567d204a5c792425b09097d79ee098fa5@i2pn2.org>
 <vq9lvn$2ei4j$3@dont-email.me>
 <4453bc0c1141c540852ea2223a7fedefc93f564c@i2pn2.org>
 <vqadoh$2ivg7$2@dont-email.me> <vqae74$2ivcn$1@dont-email.me>
 <vqag6q$2jief$1@dont-email.me> <vqagb7$2ivcn$3@dont-email.me>
 <vqakhi$2jief$3@dont-email.me> <vqalvr$2ivcn$5@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2025 01:26:04 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="31ecbf9b8248da752683db0a32c63c17";
	logging-data="2802503"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+h4JY8yBKLCOiCV7mPPVCh"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:rr0jBjhkRorsNjCi/AXJn7GDQI0=
In-Reply-To: <vqalvr$2ivcn$5@dont-email.me>
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250305-8, 3/5/2025), Outbound message
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Bytes: 6067

On 3/5/2025 5:16 PM, dbush wrote:
> On 3/5/2025 5:51 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 3/5/2025 3:39 PM, dbush wrote:
>>> On 3/5/2025 4:37 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 3/5/2025 3:03 PM, dbush wrote:
>>>>> On 3/5/2025 3:55 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/5/2025 10:14 AM, joes wrote:
>>>>>>> Am Wed, 05 Mar 2025 08:10:00 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>>>> On 3/5/2025 6:19 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 3/5/25 12:09 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 3/4/2025 11:07 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/4/25 11:48 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/4/2025 10:44 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/4/25 7:34 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/4/2025 5:45 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/4/25 11:11 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/4/2025 9:08 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Op 04.mrt.2025 om 15:17 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/4/2025 3:14 AM, Fred. Zwarts
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Op 04.mrt.2025 om 04:07 schreef
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> olcott:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, my claim remains: HHH fails to reach
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the 'ret' instruction, where the direct
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> execution and some world-class simulators have no 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem to reach it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DD calls its own emulator when emulated by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HHH. DD DOES NOT call its own emulator
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> when emulated by HHH1. DD DOES NOT call
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its own emulator when directly executed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which just show your stupidity, as DD
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't HAVE its own emulator, and CAN'T
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know who or if it is being emulated.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is not my stupidity it is your dishonestly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using the straw-man deception to change the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subject away from: DD correctly emulated by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HHH cannot possibly reach its own "ret" instruction and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> terminate normally.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> WHich is the strawman, that you are too stupid
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to recogines.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I will show that it is not straw-man after you
>>>>>>>>>>>> quit dodging that point.
>>>>>>>>>>> Wrong order,
>>>>>>>>>> I WILL NOT TOLERATE ANY OTHER ORDER
>>>>>>>>> In other words, you CAN'T handle any other order, even
>>>>>>>>> though logically requried, because you need to hide your
>>>>>>>>> fraud.
>>>>>>>> My proof requires a specific  prerequisite order. One
>>>>>>>> cannot learn algebra before one has learned to count to
>>>>>>>> ten. DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach
>>>>>>>> its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally. Is the
>>>>>>>> first step of the mandatory prerequisite order of my proof
>>>>>>> What is the next step?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach* *its own
>>>>>> "ret" instruction and terminate normally*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It has taken two years to create this first step such that it is 
>>>>>> the the simplest way to state the key element of the whole
>>>>>> proof and make this element impossible to correctly refute.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> EVERY ATTEMPT TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT AWAY FROM THIS POINT IS
>>>>>> DISHONEST.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Before agreeing on an answer, it is first required to agree on
>>>>> the question.
>>>>
>>>> *DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach* *its own
>>>> "ret" instruction and terminate normally*
>>>>
>>>> This is irrefutable. Every attempt to show otherwise has been a
>>>> change of subject.
>>>>
>>>> Until we have mutual agreement on that key most important point
>>>> upon which all other points depend this point will be repeated.
>>>>
>>>
>>> So if you say "there's a black cat in the kitchen" and I want to
>>> know if there's a white dog in my living room, how is that in any
>>> way useful?
>>
>> In other words 
> 
> You'll be disappointed when you realize what you've been working on is 
> the wrong thing.

Off topic, thus ignored.
True(X) is required for righteousness.

-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer