Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid
 rebuttals ---PSR---
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 23:42:38 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 52
Message-ID: <vqb93t$2lue4$7@dont-email.me>
References: <vq5qqc$1j128$2@dont-email.me> <vq6g9l$1ptg9$2@dont-email.me>
 <vq722k$1tapm$1@dont-email.me> <vq751g$1t7oc$1@dont-email.me>
 <vq78ni$1u8bl$3@dont-email.me>
 <5e786c32c2dcc88be50183203781dcb6a5d8d046@i2pn2.org>
 <vq866t$23nt0$1@dont-email.me>
 <2002d599ebdfb7cd5a023881ab2faca9801b219d@i2pn2.org>
 <vq8l3d$29b9l$1@dont-email.me>
 <4426787ad065bfd0939e10b937f3b8b2798d0578@i2pn2.org>
 <vq8mam$29b9l$5@dont-email.me>
 <8bc20e52d5f532f91a92a20e5609f1b7931a4d66@i2pn2.org>
 <vq9lo5$2ei4j$2@dont-email.me>
 <21b6193777e9d527bbac94cfd17d80f0d8a39573@i2pn2.org>
 <vqb91m$2mueq$5@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2025 05:42:38 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7e9a184460760c22e32d5c12ff9ace5a";
	logging-data="2816452"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+1YkMA7Hhd1+Ipkk+4mVMQ"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:YTucJ9ok912lC+gP/4ld/z0EiKo=
In-Reply-To: <vqb91m$2mueq$5@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3946

On 3/5/2025 11:41 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 3/5/2025 5:28 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 3/5/25 9:05 AM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 3/5/2025 3:27 AM, joes wrote:
>>>> Am Tue, 04 Mar 2025 23:09:42 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>>>> On 3/4/2025 11:07 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/4/25 11:48 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>> On 3/4/2025 10:44 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 3/4/25 7:34 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 3/4/2025 5:45 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 3/4/25 11:11 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/4/2025 9:08 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Op 04.mrt.2025 om 15:17 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/4/2025 3:14 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Op 04.mrt.2025 om 04:07 schreef olcott:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So, my claim remains: HHH fails to reach the 'ret' instruction,
>>>>>>>>>>>> where the direct execution and some world-class simulators have
>>>>>>>>>>>> no problem to reach it.
>>>>>>>>>>> DD calls its own emulator when emulated by HHH.
>>>>>>>>>>> DD DOES NOT call its own emulator when emulated by HHH1. DD DOES
>>>>>>>>>>> NOT call its own emulator when directly executed.
>>>>>>>>>> Which just show your stupidity, as DD doesn't HAVE its own
>>>>>>>>>> emulator, and CAN'T know who or if it is being emulated.
>>>>>>>>> It is not my stupidity it is your dishonestly using the straw-man
>>>>>>>>> deception to change the subject away from:
>>>>>>>>> DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own "ret"
>>>>>>>>> instruction and terminate normally.
>>>>>>>> WHich is the strawman, that you are too stupid to recogines.
>>>>>>> I will show that it is not straw-man after you quit dodging that
>>>>>>> point.
>>>>>> Wrong order,
>>>>> I WILL NOT TOLERATE ANY OTHER ORDER
>>>> lol "I will explain why this is your argument after you agree to it" 
>>>> smh
>>>>
>>>
>>> When DD emulated by HHH calls HHH(DD) (its own emulator)
>>> it tells HHH to emulate itself again in recursive emulation
>>> until aborted because DD is calling its own emulator.
>>>
>>
>> But only if HHH is actually just an emulator and not a decider.
> 
> No matter WTF HHH is DD cannot possibly reach its "ret"
> instruction and terminate normally when correctly emulated by HHH.
> Either this is over your head or you are a liar. There is
> no third choice.
> 

Tick Tock ...