Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vqcgic$31drl$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Windows Is A Great OS ... If Your Time Is Worth Nothing Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 10:55:55 -0500 Organization: None Lines: 37 Message-ID: <vqcgic$31drl$3@dont-email.me> References: <vpasam$3is8a$1@dont-email.me> <vpb674$3kqle$1@dont-email.me> <67c2d399$0$29724$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <ajEwP.9843$3pn5.7884@fx44.iad> <vq3kfi$17uke$3@dont-email.me> <xxixP.60075$Xq5f.22596@fx38.iad> <vq8s6f$2a88v$3@dont-email.me> Reply-To: OFeem1987@teleworm.us MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2025 16:55:56 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f5f55e933e3ba27af386ce414ccef4af"; logging-data="3192693"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+FUland20w/KZEBM9NcKIR" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:+bF0N20paVSdz5BGfrHvLHHWeQw= X-Slrn: Why use anything else? X-Face: 63n<76,LYJQ2m#'5YL#.T95xqyPiG`ffIP70tN+j"(&@6(4l\7uL)2+/-r0)/9SjZ`qw= Njn mr93Xrerx}aQG-Ap5IHn"xe;`5:pp"$RH>Kx_ngWw%c\+6qSg!q"41n2[.N/;Pu6q8?+Poz~e A9? $6_R7cm.l!s8]yfv7x+-FYQ|/k X-User-Agent: Microsoft Outl00k, Usenet K00k Editions X-Mutt: The most widely-used MUA Bytes: 2964 Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote this post while blinking in Morse code: > On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 08:55:40 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: > >> On 2025-03-03 2:07 a.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 1 Mar 2025 08:53:08 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: >>> >>>> I then told them that someone else's garbage can be their treasure, >>>> and Linux allows for the "equity" today's generation seems to be >>>> begging for. >>> >>> What a remarkably woke thing to say. >> >> Not really. Woke would be to ensure that everyone has the same computer >> today, regardless of whether they have the means to buy something better >> or not. In other words, both the rich and the poor would be running >> something like today's equivalent of a Commodore 64 with no option to >> increase RAM or add accessories. > > So a Commodore 64 is “woke”, but, say, an Apple Iphone is not? "Woke" is just another word appropriated as a bogeyman for magahats. -- Yielding Nothing in the world is as soft and yielding as water, Yet nothing can better overcome the hard and strong, For they can neither control nor do away with it. The soft overcomes the hard, The yielding overcomes the strong; Every person knows this, But no one can practice it. Who attends to the people would control the land and grain; Who attends to the state would control the whole world; Truth is easily hidden by rhetoric. -- Lao Tse, "Tao Te Ching"