Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid
 rebuttals ---PSR---
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 14:18:11 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 58
Message-ID: <vqcvu3$34c3r$5@dont-email.me>
References: <vq5qqc$1j128$2@dont-email.me> <vq722k$1tapm$1@dont-email.me>
 <vq751g$1t7oc$1@dont-email.me> <vq78ni$1u8bl$3@dont-email.me>
 <5e786c32c2dcc88be50183203781dcb6a5d8d046@i2pn2.org>
 <vq866t$23nt0$1@dont-email.me>
 <2002d599ebdfb7cd5a023881ab2faca9801b219d@i2pn2.org>
 <vq8l3d$29b9l$1@dont-email.me>
 <4426787ad065bfd0939e10b937f3b8b2798d0578@i2pn2.org>
 <vq8mam$29b9l$5@dont-email.me>
 <920b573567d204a5c792425b09097d79ee098fa5@i2pn2.org>
 <vq9lvn$2ei4j$3@dont-email.me>
 <4453bc0c1141c540852ea2223a7fedefc93f564c@i2pn2.org>
 <vqadoh$2ivg7$2@dont-email.me> <vqae74$2ivcn$1@dont-email.me>
 <vqag6q$2jief$1@dont-email.me> <vqagb7$2ivcn$3@dont-email.me>
 <vqakhi$2jief$3@dont-email.me> <vqalvr$2ivcn$5@dont-email.me>
 <vqaq2s$2lgq7$2@dont-email.me> <vqasm4$2lue4$1@dont-email.me>
 <vqb43k$2mueq$1@dont-email.me> <vqb4ub$2lue4$3@dont-email.me>
 <vqb683$2mueq$2@dont-email.me> <vqb6f4$2lue4$4@dont-email.me>
 <vqb6qr$2mueq$3@dont-email.me>
 <27b6da57f540cd39d2918411d8c94789678e3f45@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2025 21:18:11 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="566f246a75be3c19f962b78108481d73";
	logging-data="3289211"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/RaTjOjl/v/mHANAGiN3VX"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Vj4W8LdFDJRTlVBO9ILiOS61k34=
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250306-6, 3/6/2025), Outbound message
In-Reply-To: <27b6da57f540cd39d2918411d8c94789678e3f45@i2pn2.org>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 4516

On 3/6/2025 3:20 AM, joes wrote:
> Am Wed, 05 Mar 2025 22:03:39 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>> On 3/5/2025 9:57 PM, dbush wrote:
>>> On 3/5/2025 10:53 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 3/5/2025 9:31 PM, dbush wrote:
>>>>> On 3/5/2025 10:17 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/5/2025 7:10 PM, dbush wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In other words, you know that what you're working on has nothing to
>>>>>>> do with the halting problem, but you don't care.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In other words I WILL NOT TOLERATE ANY BULLSHIT DEFLECTION.
>>>>>> You have proven that you know these things pretty well SO QUIT THE
>>>>>> SHIT!
>>>>> You want people to accept that HHH(DD) does in fact report that
>>>>> changing the code of HHH to an unconditional simulator and running
>>>>> HHH(DD) will not halt.
>>>>>
>>>> DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own "ret"
>>>> instruction and terminate normally.
>>>
>>> In other words, replacing the code of HHH with an unconditional
>>> simulator and subsequently running HHH(DD) does not halt, which you
>>> previously agreed is correct:
>>> On 2/22/2025 1:02 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>   > On 2/22/2025 11:10 AM, dbush wrote:
>>>   >> On 2/22/2025 11:43 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>   >>> The first point is DD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly
>>>   >>> terminate normally by reaching its own "return" instruction.
>>>   >>
>>>   >> In other words, if the code of HHH is replaced with an
>>>   >> unconditional simulator then it can be shown that DD is
>>>   >> non-halting and therefore HHH(DD)==0 is correct.
>>>   >>
>>>   > Wow finally someone that totally gets it.
>>>
>>> If you disagree, explain why this is different.
>>> In particular, give an example where X correctly emulated by Y is
>>> different from replacing the code of Y with an unconditional simulator
>>> and subsequently running Y(X).
>>
>> I may not have enough time left to change the subject and endlessly go
>> through anything but the exact point.

> You used to have enough time.
> 

That is before the CAR T cell manufacturing process failed twice.

>> The purpose of these posts is so that my posthumous reviewers will
>> understand.

> There won't be any.


-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer