Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vqd0lt$34hb8$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: Apple tacitly admits their CPUs and new Modem are merely a
 marketing gimmick
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 12:30:53 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <vqd0lt$34hb8$1@dont-email.me>
References: <76c59e31ac44677e6484fba540ef2ad7a65fb9ec@i2pn2.org>
 <vpaq0p$3ig4r$1@dont-email.me> <vpb1vg$3k7ot$1@dont-email.me>
 <vpcd0i$3trlb$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: scharf.steven@geemail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2025 21:30:54 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="845a5882acb4f7167b1399dff4cbc3c4";
	logging-data="3294568"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18NvaU905TXE9vy4W4mY3QH"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:qATPiNN1jojVmGrgQXSUol4003I=
In-Reply-To: <vpcd0i$3trlb$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2221

On 2/22/2025 3:38 AM, -hh wrote:

<snip>

> In any event, there's more things than just geekery to criticize the new 
> iPhone 16E about.  Since the Apple modem is to not pay Qualcomm's high 
> chip licensing costs, then why did the price jump up by so much?  For 
> the $170 increase from $429 to $599 is a whopping +40%.  Tariffs?

It's a certainty that the pricing reflected careful research of what the 
believed would generate optimal profit. If they are wrong, they can 
lower the price to $499 or $459, or whatever.

The 16e is going to be purchased by a lot of corporations that provide 
iPhones to their employees, and that see the $599 price as a good deal 
because previously they were not forcing employees to take the SE, with 
the smaller screen, and were paying more than $599 (or whatever 
corporate price they negotiated). At my wife's company, a lot of her 
colleagues took the SE despite being allowed to take a larger screen model.