Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vqd2ck$155rm$1@solani.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: Apple tacitly admits their CPUs and new Modem are merely
 a marketing gimmick
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 21:00:04 -0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <vqd2ck$155rm$1@solani.org>
References: <76c59e31ac44677e6484fba540ef2ad7a65fb9ec@i2pn2.org>
 <vpaq0p$3ig4r$1@dont-email.me>
 <vpb1vg$3k7ot$1@dont-email.me>
 <vpcd0i$3trlb$1@dont-email.me>
 <vqd0lt$34hb8$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 21:00:04 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: solani.org;
	logging-data="1218422"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:KTxNT5lQN32u08bPlhROgyU7C4c= sha1:xvZOwtyPV3Wj4nyi5ADX9q3wuHk=
X-User-ID: eJwNwgkRwEAIBDBLMCwcyOH1L6GdRMXY+sHUoPfL5STf14AQlqLpsotjB0YoDL/2pnWZ0QyxSLmRapu4+gBfuxZK
Bytes: 2497
Lines: 26

sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:
> On 2/22/2025 3:38 AM, -hh wrote:
> 
> <snip>
> 
>> In any event, there's more things than just geekery to criticize the new 
>> iPhone 16E about.  Since the Apple modem is to not pay Qualcomm's high 
>> chip licensing costs, then why did the price jump up by so much?  For 
>> the $170 increase from $429 to $599 is a whopping +40%.  Tariffs?
> 
> It's a certainty that the pricing reflected careful research of what the 
> believed would generate optimal profit. If they are wrong, they can 
> lower the price to $499 or $459, or whatever.
> 
> The 16e is going to be purchased by a lot of corporations that provide 
> iPhones to their employees, and that see the $599 price as a good deal 
> because previously they were not forcing employees to take the SE, with 
> the smaller screen, and were paying more than $599 (or whatever 
> corporate price they negotiated). At my wife's company, a lot of her 
> colleagues took the SE despite being allowed to take a larger screen model.
> 

I got a new corporate phone about four months ago and had the choice
between SE, 14, 15 models and all their variants. I chose the regular 14 to
match my personal phone because I didn’t want two different chargers
(lightning, usb-c) at home, work, car.