Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid
 rebuttals ---PSR---
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 15:13:25 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 95
Message-ID: <vqd35l$34sev$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vq5qqc$1j128$2@dont-email.me> <vq6g9l$1ptg9$2@dont-email.me>
 <vq722k$1tapm$1@dont-email.me> <vq751g$1t7oc$1@dont-email.me>
 <vq78ni$1u8bl$3@dont-email.me>
 <5e786c32c2dcc88be50183203781dcb6a5d8d046@i2pn2.org>
 <vq866t$23nt0$1@dont-email.me>
 <2002d599ebdfb7cd5a023881ab2faca9801b219d@i2pn2.org>
 <vq8l3d$29b9l$1@dont-email.me>
 <4426787ad065bfd0939e10b937f3b8b2798d0578@i2pn2.org>
 <vq8mam$29b9l$5@dont-email.me>
 <920b573567d204a5c792425b09097d79ee098fa5@i2pn2.org>
 <vq9lvn$2ei4j$3@dont-email.me>
 <4453bc0c1141c540852ea2223a7fedefc93f564c@i2pn2.org>
 <vqadoh$2ivg7$2@dont-email.me> <vqae74$2ivcn$1@dont-email.me>
 <vqag6q$2jief$1@dont-email.me>
 <500045f9223c5ab455ca73a046d61ddd5122db2e@i2pn2.org>
 <vqb9fi$2mueq$7@dont-email.me>
 <7c141f3bbc815bd533b7f7cb62fccd68c7297b1b@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2025 22:13:26 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1c6e0bbc6933c472882837758b37c8c5";
	logging-data="3305951"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18l9JTgfP/Jw6hIA/Sjsjua"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:40N+HNAIO8b/NL93GACHdnGmsjA=
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250306-6, 3/6/2025), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
In-Reply-To: <7c141f3bbc815bd533b7f7cb62fccd68c7297b1b@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 6161

On 3/6/2025 6:36 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 3/5/25 11:48 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 3/5/2025 5:39 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 3/5/25 4:37 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 3/5/2025 3:03 PM, dbush wrote:
>>>>> On 3/5/2025 3:55 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/5/2025 10:14 AM, joes wrote:
>>>>>>> Am Wed, 05 Mar 2025 08:10:00 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>>>> On 3/5/2025 6:19 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 3/5/25 12:09 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 3/4/2025 11:07 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/4/25 11:48 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/4/2025 10:44 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/4/25 7:34 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/4/2025 5:45 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/4/25 11:11 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/4/2025 9:08 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Op 04.mrt.2025 om 15:17 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/4/2025 3:14 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Op 04.mrt.2025 om 04:07 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, my claim remains: HHH fails to reach the 'ret' 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instruction,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> where the direct execution and some world-class 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simulators have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no problem to reach it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DD calls its own emulator when emulated by HHH.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DD DOES NOT call its own emulator when emulated by HHH1. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DD DOES
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NOT call its own emulator when directly executed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which just show your stupidity, as DD doesn't HAVE its own
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> emulator, and CAN'T know who or if it is being emulated.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is not my stupidity it is your dishonestly using the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> straw-man
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deception to change the subject away from:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "ret"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instruction and terminate normally.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> WHich is the strawman, that you are too stupid to recogines.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I will show that it is not straw-man after you quit dodging 
>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>> point.
>>>>>>>>>>> Wrong order,
>>>>>>>>>> I WILL NOT TOLERATE ANY OTHER ORDER
>>>>>>>>> In other words, you CAN'T handle any other order, even though 
>>>>>>>>> logically
>>>>>>>>> requried, because you need to hide your fraud.
>>>>>>>> My proof requires a specific  prerequisite order.
>>>>>>>> One cannot learn algebra before one has learned to count to ten.
>>>>>>>> DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own "ret"
>>>>>>>> instruction and terminate normally.
>>>>>>>> Is the first step of the mandatory prerequisite order of my proof
>>>>>>> What is the next step?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach*
>>>>>> *its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It has taken two years to create this first step such that it
>>>>>> is the the simplest way to state the key element of the
>>>>>> whole proof and make this element impossible to correctly refute.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> EVERY ATTEMPT TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT AWAY FROM THIS POINT
>>>>>> IS DISHONEST.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Before agreeing on an answer, it is first required to agree on the 
>>>>> question.
>>>>
>>>> *DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach*
>>>> *its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally*
>>>
>>> Right, and thus any HHH that does a correct emulation can not return 
>>> to its caller, 
>>
>> We have been over this point too many times you are
>> just a liar. Liar and Christian is a combination with
>> very bad consequences.
>>
> 
> You have said that many times, but you can't actually show what is wrong 
> with it. 

A simulating termination analyzer HHH correctly simulates
its input finite string DD until it correctly determine
that DD cannot possibly reach its own "ret" instruction
and terminate normally.

HHH does not stupidly get stuck in non-halting behavior
as you suggest that it should.


-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer