Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vqf4uh$3jibo$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bp@www.zefox.net
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: wtf chain ring bolts
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 15:56:01 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <vqf4uh$3jibo$1@dont-email.me>
References: <a9fhsj5uot4r2ctagf55estg8iusrgr1u0@4ax.com> <vqahsh$2jlct$1@dont-email.me> <vqbvt0$2uir6$4@dont-email.me> <m2tkhnF84cuU1@mid.individual.net> <vqcdpb$312hh$1@dont-email.me> <vqck11$32aik$1@dont-email.me> <vqcmgc$312hh$3@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2025 16:56:01 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="07a135c6683b4c872d025ef1480ec572";
	logging-data="3787128"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18dMpRcsivPQVurd01/Y9DPFSMV4fuGQY0="
User-Agent: tin/2.6.4-20241224 ("Helmsdale") (FreeBSD/14.2-STABLE (arm64))
Cancel-Lock: sha1:nBQhxj4fjrzGT+OzZH89OcIn79w=
Bytes: 1500

AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
> 
> "tubulars".*
> 
> They predate numerical designations but originally were 
> called 28 inch as they were a lot fatter then. Actual rim 
> diameter is 630mm.

So the tire was named by major diameter x width and the wheel 
by major tire diameter minus twice the minor diameter? That's  
sensible. Provided the cross section is always circular. Is it?

Thanks for writing!

bob prohaska