Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Jewish Journalist Arrested for Objecting to Islamic Terror Symbol
 in Grocery Store
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 17:20:22 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 43
Message-ID: <vqfrf7$3odqf$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vqcu84$33k3l$3@dont-email.me> <vqfjfl$3mpjn$1@dont-email.me>
 <vqfk6l$3n6mi$1@dont-email.me> <vqfmg0$3mm4s$4@dont-email.me>
 <vqfnn3$3nt4f$2@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2025 23:20:23 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="bb153c52fd25747ef2b3c7954d50a156";
	logging-data="3946319"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18qdDUk3skPTVfMXyCZDiOFSu/pXZnf8O4="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:nZOBv52vheyp3+z6QEdtXTS1AqE=
In-Reply-To: <vqfnn3$3nt4f$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US

On 3/7/2025 4:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On Mar 7, 2025 at 12:55:28 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
> 
>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>> Mar 7, 2025 at 12:04:04 PM PST, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>> On 3/6/2025 2:49 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://rairfoundation.com/jewish-journalist-sloan-rachmuth-arrested-objecting-islamic-terror/
>>
>>>>> ...
>>
>>>> Arrested for 'cyberstalking', not  "objecting".
>>
>>> Which is much a bullshit charge as objecting, as was explained in the
>>> original
>>> post**, and why the district attorney immediately shit-canned the case
>>> because
>>> she knew the arrest both failed to meet the elements of the crime charged and
>>> flagrantly violated the 1st Amendment.
>>
>> But but but...

Adam needs a tune-up (...if not a different tune altogether).


> she was arrested for violating moviePig law!
>>
>> 	[Sloan] Rachmuth, a mother of two, says she was shocked and
>> 	confused by the officers' presence. When she demanded the reason
>> 	for her arrest, Officer Benjamin Marino chillingly replied,
>> 	"Something you did made her uncomfortable, all right?"
> 
> It would have been even more chilling if the officer replied, "Something you
> said wasn't of any societal value according to The moviePig Exception to the
> 1st Amendment."

You're having a recurring dream.  As I appear to be in it, perhaps you 
can say what my lines are, and I'll try to help with the interpretation.

(Meanwhile, iirc the officer was immediately reprimanded...)