Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid
 rebuttals ---PSR---
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2025 16:42:13 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <vqih45$bcso$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vq5qqc$1j128$2@dont-email.me> <vq866t$23nt0$1@dont-email.me>
 <2002d599ebdfb7cd5a023881ab2faca9801b219d@i2pn2.org>
 <vq8l3d$29b9l$1@dont-email.me>
 <4426787ad065bfd0939e10b937f3b8b2798d0578@i2pn2.org>
 <vq8mam$29b9l$5@dont-email.me>
 <920b573567d204a5c792425b09097d79ee098fa5@i2pn2.org>
 <vq9lvn$2ei4j$3@dont-email.me>
 <4453bc0c1141c540852ea2223a7fedefc93f564c@i2pn2.org>
 <vqadoh$2ivg7$2@dont-email.me> <vqae74$2ivcn$1@dont-email.me>
 <vqag6q$2jief$1@dont-email.me> <vqagb7$2ivcn$3@dont-email.me>
 <vqakhi$2jief$3@dont-email.me> <vqalvr$2ivcn$5@dont-email.me>
 <vqaq2s$2lgq7$2@dont-email.me> <vqasm4$2lue4$1@dont-email.me>
 <vqb43k$2mueq$1@dont-email.me> <vqb4ub$2lue4$3@dont-email.me>
 <vqb683$2mueq$2@dont-email.me> <vqbp05$2td95$1@dont-email.me>
 <vqcvlu$34c3r$3@dont-email.me> <vqecht$3epcf$1@dont-email.me>
 <vqf2lh$3j68u$5@dont-email.me> <vqf6mm$3j47v$4@dont-email.me>
 <vqg7ng$3qol2$3@dont-email.me> <vqh07g$26ac$1@dont-email.me>
 <vqhio1$5r7r$1@dont-email.me> <vqhm1s$6fo8$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2025 23:42:14 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ffa3f7c8a9c06536bf515dd54724b6f7";
	logging-data="373656"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/yEIx0W/KDCOl6WqXw3VvH"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:vu0JpDsQDW8N5FehL0wLLEhEGoU=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250308-4, 3/8/2025), Outbound message
In-Reply-To: <vqhm1s$6fo8$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3285

On 3/8/2025 9:00 AM, dbush wrote:
> On 3/8/2025 9:03 AM, olcott wrote:
>>
>> Apparently you don't understand that inputs to a
>> simulating termination analyzer specifying infinite
>> recursion or recursive emulation cannot possibly
>> reach their own final state and terminate normally.
> 
> Apparently you don't understand that inputs to a termination analyzer, 
> simulating or otherwise, are specified by the specification that is the 
> halting function:
> 
> (<X>,Y) maps to 1 if and only if X(Y) halts when executed directly
> (<X>,Y) maps to 0 if and only if X(Y) does not halt when executed
> 
> And HHH(DD)==0 fails to meet the above specification

*THIS IS A SEMANTIC TAUTOLOGY THUS IMPOSSIBLY FALSE*
DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach
its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally
because DD calls HHH(DD) in recursive emulation.

It is ridiculously stupid to believe that HHH must
report on behavior other than the above behavior.

-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer