| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vqihso$bkmo$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Moebius <invalid@example.invalid>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: New way of dealing with complex numbers
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2025 23:55:20 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <vqihso$bkmo$3@dont-email.me>
References: <kRgli3QEdimCvJ9569p9c9pq7Kc@jntp> <vqemhv$2gck$1@news.muc.de>
<h8RR2Nzw97n_q0rv1uxcQeGImmk@jntp> <vqfm6n$3ndao$2@dont-email.me>
<pPxKmW5wI10Jy2mOG_Y_84dfZXg@jntp> <vqhanm$4cd3$1@dont-email.me>
<8wfDWQnhQFqO9uBQ5h-nF8mcuFk@jntp> <vqhgtr$5je4$1@dont-email.me>
<vqihdj$bkmo$2@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: invalid@example.invalid
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2025 23:55:20 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="bb9edeeeddeb8dcebd46aa6a250807e0";
logging-data="381656"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+fU5cMJi4YTbq45vpSyMOD"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:foxUH7VKRze11PtQwE5E+lpRSEc=
In-Reply-To: <vqihdj$bkmo$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: de-DE
Bytes: 1872
Am 08.03.2025 um 23:47 schrieb Moebius:
> Am 08.03.2025 um 14:32 schrieb efji:
>> Le 08/03/2025 à 14:18, Richard Hachel a écrit :
>
>> Associativity is MANDATORY to be able to write something like i^4 =
>> i*i*i*i.
>>
>> For a non associative operator, i^4 means NOTHING.
>
> Oh, i^(n+1) just might mean (i^n) * i (with n e IN).
>
> [And i^0 = 1.]
>
> Then: i^4 = ((i*i)*i)*i.
>
> [Hint: recursive definition:
> x^0 = 1
> x^(n+1) = x^n * x (for all n e IN)]
x^0 = 1
x^(n+1) = (x^n) * x (for all n e IN)]
.... if you like.