Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vqiovv$d4j1$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid rebuttals ---PSR--- Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2025 19:56:31 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 56 Message-ID: <vqiovv$d4j1$2@dont-email.me> References: <vq5qqc$1j128$2@dont-email.me> <vq8mam$29b9l$5@dont-email.me> <920b573567d204a5c792425b09097d79ee098fa5@i2pn2.org> <vq9lvn$2ei4j$3@dont-email.me> <4453bc0c1141c540852ea2223a7fedefc93f564c@i2pn2.org> <vqadoh$2ivg7$2@dont-email.me> <vqae74$2ivcn$1@dont-email.me> <vqag6q$2jief$1@dont-email.me> <vqagb7$2ivcn$3@dont-email.me> <vqakhi$2jief$3@dont-email.me> <vqalvr$2ivcn$5@dont-email.me> <vqaq2s$2lgq7$2@dont-email.me> <vqasm4$2lue4$1@dont-email.me> <vqb43k$2mueq$1@dont-email.me> <vqb4ub$2lue4$3@dont-email.me> <vqb683$2mueq$2@dont-email.me> <vqbp05$2td95$1@dont-email.me> <vqcvlu$34c3r$3@dont-email.me> <vqecht$3epcf$1@dont-email.me> <vqf2lh$3j68u$5@dont-email.me> <vqf6mm$3j47v$4@dont-email.me> <vqg7ng$3qol2$3@dont-email.me> <vqh07g$26ac$1@dont-email.me> <vqhio1$5r7r$1@dont-email.me> <vqhm1s$6fo8$2@dont-email.me> <vqih45$bcso$1@dont-email.me> <vqii32$bcd0$3@dont-email.me> <vqijht$bcso$3@dont-email.me> <vqik16$bcd0$5@dont-email.me> <vqine6$cton$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2025 01:56:32 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a7cd4af0ac1547313f65cbaef3f65f1f"; logging-data="430689"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ojCGl2IIgaeRLcAdDNOJE" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:II24hHrlKf6YltrDQHfevFAxBdc= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <vqine6$cton$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 4229 On 3/8/2025 7:29 PM, olcott wrote: > On 3/8/2025 5:31 PM, dbush wrote: >> On 3/8/2025 6:23 PM, olcott wrote: >>> On 3/8/2025 4:58 PM, dbush wrote: >>>> On 3/8/2025 5:42 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>> On 3/8/2025 9:00 AM, dbush wrote: >>>>>> On 3/8/2025 9:03 AM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Apparently you don't understand that inputs to a >>>>>>> simulating termination analyzer specifying infinite >>>>>>> recursion or recursive emulation cannot possibly >>>>>>> reach their own final state and terminate normally. >>>>>> >>>>>> Apparently you don't understand that inputs to a termination >>>>>> analyzer, simulating or otherwise, are specified by the >>>>>> specification that is the halting function: >>>>>> >>>>>> (<X>,Y) maps to 1 if and only if X(Y) halts when executed directly >>>>>> (<X>,Y) maps to 0 if and only if X(Y) does not halt when executed >>>>>> >>>>>> And HHH(DD)==0 fails to meet the above specification >>>>> >>>>> *THIS IS A SEMANTIC TAUTOLOGY THUS IMPOSSIBLY FALSE* >>>>> Replacing the code of HHH with an unconditional simulator and >>>>> subsequently running HHH(DD) cannot possibly reach >>>>> its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally >>>>> because DD calls HHH(DD) in recursive emulation. >>>>> >>>>> It is ridiculously stupid to believe that HHH must >>>>> report on behavior other than the above behavior. >>>>> >>>> >>>> It must if it is to be classified as a halt decider or termination >>>> analyzer as per the definition. >>> >>> In other words you believe that HHH >> >> Is required to map the halting function to meet the requirements to be >> a halt decider / termination analyzer. >> > > HHH must map from the input finite string DD > to the behavior that this finite string specifies And what it specifies, to be considered a solution to the halting problem, is given by the specification: Given any algorithm (i.e. a fixed immutable sequence of instructions) X described as <X> with input Y: A solution to the halting problem is an algorithm H that computes the following mapping: (<X>,Y) maps to 1 if and only if X(Y) halts when executed directly (<X>,Y) maps to 0 if and only if X(Y) does not halt when executed