Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid
 rebuttals ---PSR---
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2025 22:45:58 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 63
Message-ID: <vqj6e6$j0t2$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vq5qqc$1j128$2@dont-email.me> <vqb43k$2mueq$1@dont-email.me>
 <vqb4ub$2lue4$3@dont-email.me> <vqb683$2mueq$2@dont-email.me>
 <vqbp05$2td95$1@dont-email.me> <vqcvlu$34c3r$3@dont-email.me>
 <vqecht$3epcf$1@dont-email.me> <vqf2lh$3j68u$5@dont-email.me>
 <vqf6mm$3j47v$4@dont-email.me> <vqg7ng$3qol2$3@dont-email.me>
 <vqh07g$26ac$1@dont-email.me> <vqhio1$5r7r$1@dont-email.me>
 <vqhm1s$6fo8$2@dont-email.me> <vqih45$bcso$1@dont-email.me>
 <vqii32$bcd0$3@dont-email.me> <vqijht$bcso$3@dont-email.me>
 <vqik16$bcd0$5@dont-email.me> <vqine6$cton$1@dont-email.me>
 <vqiovv$d4j1$2@dont-email.me> <vqiqk0$dc6s$2@dont-email.me>
 <vqirn6$dje3$1@dont-email.me> <vqiug9$duqq$1@dont-email.me>
 <vqiur3$dje3$3@dont-email.me> <vqj2ab$dje3$8@dont-email.me>
 <vqj2pn$ef0h$7@dont-email.me> <vqj342$dje3$10@dont-email.me>
 <vqj3bc$ef0h$9@dont-email.me> <vqj3n1$dje3$12@dont-email.me>
 <vqj460$il72$1@dont-email.me> <vqj4mf$ikc5$1@dont-email.me>
 <vqj57r$ipa4$1@dont-email.me> <vqj5k2$dje3$13@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2025 05:46:01 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d75665534b29fc22cfbd837ef533f60b";
	logging-data="623522"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18BNpzs9PebDZCLsSZiNCtq"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4XovaZbmQH72pk2GDz/ebm6snE4=
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250308-6, 3/8/2025), Outbound message
In-Reply-To: <vqj5k2$dje3$13@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Bytes: 4220

On 3/8/2025 10:32 PM, dbush wrote:
> On 3/8/2025 11:25 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 3/8/2025 10:16 PM, dbush wrote:
>>> On 3/8/2025 11:07 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 3/8/2025 9:59 PM, dbush wrote:
>>>>> On 3/8/2025 10:53 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/8/2025 9:49 PM, dbush wrote:
>>>>>>> On 3/8/2025 10:43 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 3/8/2025 9:35 PM, dbush wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Your copy-paste answer to multiple threads indicates you have 
>>>>>>>>> no real rebuttal for what others have said.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *This is all you get from me until this point is fully addressed*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   <copy-paste response>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In other words, you have no rebuttal. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *This is all you get from me until this point is fully addressed*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *UNTIL YOU FULLY UNDERSTAND THIS YOU CAN'T POSSIBLY UNDERSTAND*
>>>>>> *THE NEXT STEP THAT ADDRESSES ALL OF THE OTHER ISSUES*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <copy-paste response>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Doesn't matter, as you've already accepted that your HHH isn't a 
>>>>> solution to the halting problem 
>>>>
>>>> *I never said that*
>>>
>>> Yes you did, by making no attempt to explain otherwise:
>>>
>>
>> *This is all you get from me until this point is fully addressed*
>> Replacing the code of HHH with an unconditional simulator and 
>> subsequently running HHH(DD) cannot possibly reach
>> its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally
>> because DD calls HHH(DD) in recursive emulation.
>>
> 
> 
> In other words, HHH fails to meet the requirement to be classified as a 
> solution to the halting problem, as you have already admitted.
> 

Erasing and replacing my words with your words
is a real scumbag move.

*This is all you get from me until this point is fully addressed*
DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach
its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally
because DD calls HHH(DD) in recursive emulation.


-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer