| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vqjdhq$juea$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!nntp.terraraq.uk!news1.firedrake.org!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail From: JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> Newsgroups: talk.origins Subject: Why the Fermi Assumption matters Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2025 01:47:22 -0500 Organization: Eek Lines: 72 Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org Message-ID: <vqjdhq$juea$3@dont-email.me> Reply-To: jtem01@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89"; logging-data="74472"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:RGpEPirDe9nzLOkNTgmBokN1/tw= Return-Path: <news@eternal-september.org> X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org id C700722978C; Sun, 09 Mar 2025 01:47:34 -0500 (EST) by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99CE7229783 for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Sun, 09 Mar 2025 01:47:32 -0500 (EST) id 40C841C07B8; Sun, 9 Mar 2025 06:47:26 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org by newsfeed.bofh.team (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35E711C06AC for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Sun, 9 Mar 2025 06:47:26 +0000 (UTC) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eternal-september.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80D55622AD for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Sun, 9 Mar 2025 06:47:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: name/80D55622AD; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com id 4137ADC01CB; Sun, 9 Mar 2025 07:47:23 +0100 (CET) X-Injection-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2025 07:47:23 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1/Kzkfp+OfzLlpgamWIhc9fyVLSmwxCcZk= Content-Language: en-US DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO, FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS,USER_IN_WELCOMELIST, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 smtp.eternal-september.org Bytes: 5048 Going back quite a long time ago -- way back when there were real people posting to this group, not just the symptoms to various crippling disorders -- I remember arguing that folks should NOT be so dogmatic in defense of the "Humans are apes!" trope. For a couple of reasons. First and foremost was the fact that the whole point of the internet, usenet & this group is COMMUNICATION. And if saying "Humans are apes" is a barrier to communications, it was raising defenses in the other side, closing down minds, then you have no choice but to drop it. Else, admit that you don't give a damn about actually reaching people, informing them... changing a mind. Secondly, it's not a "Truth" but a "Convention." It's a way that we order things... our relationship to other animals. It's how we put things together in our minds to aid on our understanding. It's not real. Logically, it makes just as much sense to go the other way: "If we are humans than our ancestors were humans and the LCA was a human and so on & so forth..." That's actually logic. You really need to summon a healthy dose of idiocy to not be able to see this. Just because we have selected to group things a certain way does not mean that there aren't other ways to group them. So why get all dogmatic in the first place? I mean, in addition to the communications issue.. Also, it's inaccurate. The LCA was bipedal and all in but absolute certainty used tools for real, not some idiot "I'm using hammer as a noun, instead of 'bang' or 'whack', so that manifests the noun into existence!" Finally, words do matter. Saying "Humans as ape" has destroyed GENERATIONS of minds, causing them to think in overly simplistic linear terms that simply are wrong. (See the LCA, above). So, choosing the wrong words stunts communications even as it poisons thinking. And, pretending there is a "Fermi Paradox" is one such case. There is no paradox. None. If you assume that aliens should be here, take a look around & don't see any, that means your assumption was wrong. That's it. I think we all assume that there are aliens, I never met anyone educated past the sixth grade who didn't believe so, but do we really have any reason to assume that they can much less should be here? We're not THERE, why should they be HERE? We can't even get our technology THERE, for Christ's sake! Shouldn't we at least make one serious attempt before throwing up our hands and collectively shouting, "Where are they?!?!?!" -- https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5