Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid rebuttals ---PSR---
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2025 11:42:17 +0200
Organization: -
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <vqjnpp$lq80$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vq5qqc$1j128$2@dont-email.me> <vq9lvn$2ei4j$3@dont-email.me> <4453bc0c1141c540852ea2223a7fedefc93f564c@i2pn2.org> <vqadoh$2ivg7$2@dont-email.me> <vqae74$2ivcn$1@dont-email.me> <vqag6q$2jief$1@dont-email.me> <vqagb7$2ivcn$3@dont-email.me> <vqakhi$2jief$3@dont-email.me> <vqalvr$2ivcn$5@dont-email.me> <vqaq2s$2lgq7$2@dont-email.me> <vqasm4$2lue4$1@dont-email.me> <vqb43k$2mueq$1@dont-email.me> <vqb4ub$2lue4$3@dont-email.me> <vqb683$2mueq$2@dont-email.me> <vqb6f4$2lue4$4@dont-email.me> <vqb6qr$2mueq$3@dont-email.me> <27b6da57f540cd39d2918411d8c94789678e3f45@i2pn2.org> <vqcvu3$34c3r$5@dont-email.me> <24c66a3611456f6a6969dc132fd8a227b26cbcbd@i2pn2.org> <vqdlqp$371bi$6@dont-email.me> <vqeceq$3epcg$1@dont-email.me> <vqf2bp$3j68u$4@dont-email.me> <vqh19v$2mh0$1@dont-email.me> <vqhj3n$5r7r$3@dont-email.me> <vqhm4q$6fo8$3@dont-email.me> <vqhs03$6vdc$5@dont-email.me> <vqig6a$bcd0$2@dont-email.me> <vqihd5$bcso$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2025 10:42:18 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="25ff0e646a062f49d12ecc759f26e035";
	logging-data="715008"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+NU4InrBVe1doDkl4NCUPR"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:cFHmiHUOurpGXwbYeRIoTma5DZE=
Bytes: 3316

On 2025-03-08 22:47:01 +0000, olcott said:

> On 3/8/2025 4:26 PM, dbush wrote:
>> On 3/8/2025 11:41 AM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 3/8/2025 9:01 AM, dbush wrote:
>>>> On 3/8/2025 9:09 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>> On 3/8/2025 3:06 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>> On 2025-03-07 15:11:53 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The code proves otherwise
>>>>>>> https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7.c
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> A program does not prove. In particular, it does not prove that no
>>>>>> different program exists.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> The source code 100% perfectly proves exactly what it
>>>>> actually does.
>>>> 
>>>> The source code contains a finite sequence of truth preserving steps 
>>>> between axioms and a statement?
>>> 
>>> The source code 100% completely specifies every single detail
>>> of exactly what it does on each specific input.
>>> Saying that it does not do this is counter-factual.
>>> 
>> 
>> In other words, the source code does not meet the definition of a 
>> proof, so your claim is false.
> 
> Dumb Bunny:
> *Proof[0] is anything that shows that X is necessarily true*
> *and thus impossibly false*
> 
> The source-code in Halt7.c combined with the input to HHH
> conclusively proves every detail of the behavior of HHH on
> this input. Disagreeing this is either foolish or dishonest.

A proof does not proove any detail of its own behaviour on any input.
A proof does not even have any behaviour nor any input.

-- 
Mikko