Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Einstein FRAUD with the paper on m=E/c^2
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2025 13:02:51 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 74
Message-ID: <vqjvpu$n8tn$1@dont-email.me>
References: <b63aec6ac23c5f03f785a3b342122e74@www.novabbs.com>
 <ebb75c2571da5e06aef09861c2e2c6a1@www.novabbs.com>
 <6856ad6ee17097c4e1580e4f40c13043@www.novabbs.com>
 <vq6vc8$1ssfk$1@dont-email.me>
 <2e0a65293b1b9ab4c1510495f33ca7b5@www.novabbs.com>
 <vq9luv$2epgi$1@dont-email.me>
 <d92589ac131ee55c5fced0b12efb47b6@www.novabbs.com>
 <vqbmnf$2tbfk$1@dont-email.me>
 <a63f5ae63b8df78f44f6497220b17eeb@www.novabbs.com>
 <67cac50f$0$16841$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
 <4c93e3730da23d52d7ae76b82315ac23@www.novabbs.com>
 <ac40ba33fdacea65758dd6ef8e7730ce@www.novabbs.com>
 <vqi77t$9sg3$1@dont-email.me>
 <6cdc9bc9d820e4a7ccc0c59d99f672e1@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2025 12:58:55 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4f60a07ca9a387e10017047b6f21e2f2";
	logging-data="762807"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19/Hf/uyEQ01QGTaVnewhLB"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:DJGn8GdhbbhiUIjpqJYoEPjyiGg=
In-Reply-To: <6cdc9bc9d820e4a7ccc0c59d99f672e1@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Language: en-GB
Bytes: 4132

Den 08.03.2025 22:57, skrev rhertz:
> 
> I wasn't expecting less from you, Paul. A sad example of how dementia
> has
> eroded most of the little brain that nature gave you at birth.

And which statement of mine have you proven wrong with this
lethal argument?

> 
> By 1900, and for retarded assholes like you and Einstein, inertia and
> mass WERE EQUIVALENT!

Indeed.
But Einstein, you and I know that what is conveyed with EM radiation
is not mass, but energy and momentum.

So when Einstein said:
"radiation conveys inertia between the emitting and absorbing bodies"
his point is that energy has inertia.
So even if the emitting body is conveying energy and no mass to
the absorbing body, the mass of the emitting body will become less
while the mass of the absorbing body will increase.

Now we know that Einstein was right, E = mc² works both ways.

Pion decay:       m → γ + γ   energy, momentum and inertia conserved
Pair production:  γ → e⁻ + e⁺ energy, momentum and inertia conserved

Remember?

> 
> And that came from Newton First Law, 200 years in the past of Einstein's
> time.

Right.
But Newton was wrong when he believed that mass always is conserved.

> 
> Real experimental and theoretical physicists (not the clerk case) were
> using the more descriptive term mass instead of inertia, but THE
> IMBECILE THAT YOU ADORE
> had to name his micro-paper as: DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON
> ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?
> 
> See, asshole? He used INERTIA instead of MASS, just to use FANCY WORDING
> in his fucking NANO-paper.
> 
> But he had to concede that he was talking about MASS all the time, when
> he rescued (L/c^2) as the MASS in the Kinetic Energy LOOK-ALIKE
> TRUNCATED EXPANSION OF GAMMA FACTOR USING McLAURIN.
> 
> 
> But now you feel ENTITLED to figure out what the CRETIN meant when he
> wrote his pico-paper?
> 
> The problem with people like you, gullible asshole who devoted a life
> defending your pagan god and relativity is that you are THE PERFECT
> TARGET OF THE KING OF CHARLATANS. And you're willing to give your life
> for such a scoundrel.
> 
> 
> I don't even feel sorry for you. You deserve what happened with you and
> will pay for your sins in the FUCKING HELL, relativist.

But I feel sorry for you, who think you can falsify SR and GR  by use of 
ad hominem and profanities.

You seem to have a very troubled mind.

-- 
Paul

https://paulba.no/