Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Cindy Hamilton <chamilton5280@invalid.com>
Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
Subject: Re: Cheap egg substitute in baking
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2025 14:15:03 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <vqk7p7$p3da$2@dont-email.me>
References: <0a5c5d87d2b48f1c776fd7f42b8c4fd7@www.novabbs.org>
 <97f6f8005f22c23dc061071bbaba5b6f@www.novabbs.org>
 <vqia42$a8ja$2@dont-email.me> <2oe0al-gf2.ln1@anthive.com>
Reply-To: hamilton@invalid.com
Injection-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2025 15:15:03 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="677a79333e09da4b23801067a8880d3f";
	logging-data="822698"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX185BouMnpqaWc+1HiO+1YE+LwutldMMhuY="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:OdI+nmwS6+XcULNE4J25F6KOBvc=

On 2025-03-09, songbird <songbird@anthive.com> wrote:
> Ed P wrote:
> ...
>> If i can't use eggs, I'm not baking it.
>
>   there's some shortbread cookies that Mom makes that do
> not have eggs in them at all.  they're still very good.

I believe Ed's point was that he's not going to use egg
substitutes.  I feel the same way.

Eggs would have to get pretty damned expensive before I'd
balk at making chocolate chip cookies because they have a
couple of eggs in them.  I think even $60/dozen would not
keep me from my annual batch.

Although at $60/dozen, I might ask my husband to rethink
his breakfast.

-- 
Cindy Hamilton