Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid
 rebuttals ---PSR---
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2025 09:32:15 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <vqk8pf$pa6c$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vq5qqc$1j128$2@dont-email.me> <vqf2lh$3j68u$5@dont-email.me>
 <vqf6mm$3j47v$4@dont-email.me> <vqg7ng$3qol2$3@dont-email.me>
 <vqh07g$26ac$1@dont-email.me> <vqhio1$5r7r$1@dont-email.me>
 <vqhm1s$6fo8$2@dont-email.me> <vqih45$bcso$1@dont-email.me>
 <vqii32$bcd0$3@dont-email.me> <vqijht$bcso$3@dont-email.me>
 <vqik16$bcd0$5@dont-email.me> <vqine6$cton$1@dont-email.me>
 <vqiovv$d4j1$2@dont-email.me> <vqiqk0$dc6s$2@dont-email.me>
 <vqirn6$dje3$1@dont-email.me> <vqiug9$duqq$1@dont-email.me>
 <vqiur3$dje3$3@dont-email.me> <vqj2ab$dje3$8@dont-email.me>
 <vqj2pn$ef0h$7@dont-email.me> <vqj342$dje3$10@dont-email.me>
 <vqj3bc$ef0h$9@dont-email.me> <vqj3n1$dje3$12@dont-email.me>
 <vqj460$il72$1@dont-email.me> <vqj4mf$ikc5$1@dont-email.me>
 <vqj57r$ipa4$1@dont-email.me> <vqj5k2$dje3$13@dont-email.me>
 <vqj6e6$j0t2$1@dont-email.me> <vqk68e$ooc8$1@dont-email.me>
 <vqk70n$o4oh$5@dont-email.me> <vqk7ee$ooc8$3@dont-email.me>
 <vqk8a6$o4oh$7@dont-email.me> <vqk8fg$ooc8$5@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2025 15:32:16 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9489a26c682238c9921fc6cb3f1d3d5b";
	logging-data="829644"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18EUhTosJlJHx3kckKmmK1q"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:VVQGXjHmISAWS3m+lK2l/3N0a+A=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vqk8fg$ooc8$5@dont-email.me>
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250309-2, 3/9/2025), Outbound message
Bytes: 4202

On 3/9/2025 9:26 AM, dbush wrote:
> On 3/9/2025 10:24 AM, olcott wrote:
>> On 3/9/2025 9:09 AM, dbush wrote:
>>> On 3/9/2025 10:01 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 3/9/2025 8:49 AM, dbush wrote:
>>>>> On 3/8/2025 11:45 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Erasing and replacing my words with your words
>>>>>> is a real scumbag move.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not when you gave your official approval to do so after admitting 
>>>>> for the record that they mean the same thing:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> (1) Replacing my quoted words with your words (as if I said
>>>> your words) is despicably dishonest.
>>>
>>> Not when you gave your official approval to do so, as posted 
>>> previously that you dishonestly trimmed.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> (2) They do not mean that same thing you removed most
>>>> of the essence of my proof.
>>>>
>>>
>>> If they didn't mean the same thing you would have explained how.  I 
>>> gave you multiple opportunities to do so and you refused.  You were 
>>> warned that failing to explain would be taken as your admission that 
>>> they were the same and you still didn't explain, therefore your 
>>> admission that they are the same was entered into the record.
>>>
>>> I'm feeling generous, so I'll give you an opportunity to explain the 
>>> difference now.  If you choose not to take that up, your on-the- 
>>> record admission stands.
>>>
>>
>> *When we assume that HHH emulates N steps of DD then*
>> DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach
>> its own "ret" instruction and terminate normally
>> because DD calls HHH(DD) in recursive emulation.
>>
>> Whether or not the correct emulation of DD by HHH
>> is finite or infinite DD cannot possibly reach its
>> own "ret" instruction and terminate normally.
>>
> 
> So again, no attempt to explain the difference.
> 
> So your admission that they are the same and permission to replace them 
> in quotes stands.

If you want to play head games you can play by yourself.

-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer