Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Anybody Got a filter for all this stupid political and
 religious arguements going on?
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2025 18:14:28 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <vqklq4$ru5u$1@dont-email.me>
References: <37emsj5sh1blqnt8q0mi8umcnmt18ulrbk@4ax.com>
 <85bfc7b7e46648a2a518c9b6d3c15de4@www.novabbs.com>
 <xn0p31ys2fafwpj001@post.eweka.nl>
 <725psj1du1pn0uodhgl3bar9j93s30rr6r@4ax.com>
 <xn0p33ii9gwx2qu002@post.eweka.nl>
 <d4lrsj566agu0v2915e1jjpk6fabrijek3@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2025 19:14:28 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b7af108ca1906a41aad8ba6e2fc16229";
	logging-data="915646"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19synWMrQxLY3mG8V8lTme4"
User-Agent: PhoNews/3.13.3 (Android/14)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+kjVw9pwWWwNGeyvc3hTuDPfVMI=
In-Reply-To: <d4lrsj566agu0v2915e1jjpk6fabrijek3@4ax.com>
Bytes: 2545

On 09/03/2025 17:52, james moffat wrote:
>On Sun, 09 Mar 2025 12:59:45 GMT, "Blueshirt" <blueshirt@indigo.news>
>wrote:
>
>>james moffat wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 08 Mar 2025 10:22:50 GMT, "Blueshirt"
>>> <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>> > 
>>> > Killfiles and filters are generally the way to go for
>>> > avoiding the 'noise' here...
>>> 
>>> Yes. That's what I am asking for . A filter to kill all the
>>> krap in here. Does anyone have one or more that works?
>>> ME
>>
>>Are you using a newsreader or a web interface to access Usenet?
>>
>>If a newsreader, most of them have the ability to "killfile"
>>people or use a filter based on words, subjects or specific
>>poster(s).
>
>Agent v8. I am familiar with the kill filter process and was just
>wondering if anyone had one pre made before I start building one up
>that might be too inclusive.
>ME
>PS:Seems to be daniel70 that is the first to get removed.

The very inappropriately self-designated "The Doctor" needs to be top of
 your list. Then, yes, sadly, Daniel, who can't help responding to him every
 single time. 

That will clear 95% of the noise from this channel.

-- 
There’s no point in being grown up if you can’t act a little childish
 sometimes.