Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vqkqq6$sucd$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: Why the Fermi Assumption matters
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2025 15:39:50 -0400
Organization: Eek
Lines: 68
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <vqkqq6$sucd$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vqjdhq$juea$3@dont-email.me>
 <tYCdnV9V99OaVFD6nZ2dnZfqlJydnZ2d@giganews.com>
Reply-To: jtem01@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
	logging-data="93421"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:eRvo4ZroGGz7PVEBJDSKSrluC7o=
Return-Path: <news@eternal-september.org>
X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
	id CF62F22978C; Sun, 09 Mar 2025 15:40:02 -0400 (EDT)
	by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91B91229783
	for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Sun, 09 Mar 2025 15:40:00 -0400 (EDT)
	id E96DC1C0909; Sun,  9 Mar 2025 19:39:53 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
	by newsfeed.bofh.team (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEB631C04FF
	for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Sun,  9 Mar 2025 19:39:53 +0000 (UTC)
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.eternal-september.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62623622AD
	for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Sun,  9 Mar 2025 19:39:51 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: name/62623622AD; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com
	id 26158DC01CA; Sun,  9 Mar 2025 20:39:51 +0100 (CET)
X-Injection-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2025 20:39:50 +0100 (CET)
X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1+5VkemNAU7mtt9dOz0rdy53fU6wjsfTSg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <tYCdnV9V99OaVFD6nZ2dnZfqlJydnZ2d@giganews.com>
	DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO,
	FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS,
	SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS,
	USER_IN_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.6
	smtp.eternal-september.org

  John Harshman wrote:

> But that's the purpose of the "humans are apes" idea: to emphasize our 
> relationships to other animals.

But it's not the relationship, as I pointed out. It's mere the
conventional means of categorization.

>> Secondly, it's not a "Truth" but a "Convention." It's a way that
>> we order things... our relationship to other animals. It's how
>> we put things together in our minds to aid on our understanding.
> 
>> It's not real. Logically, it makes just as much sense to go the
>> other way:  "If we are humans than our ancestors were humans and
>> the LCA was a human and so on & so forth..."
> 
> Taken to its logical conclusion, then, you would like to declare that 
> all of life be considered human.

No. Taken with reading comprehension, I just said that the goal is to
communicate not act dogmatic. As a narcissist, you must control
conversations. They exist as an exercise in power, in your ego.

Calling humans "Apes," though not a reality of nature but a human
convention, was a barrier to communication with many creationists. And
you're a narcissist, you can't cede that as you need control.

>> That's actually logic. You really need to summon a healthy dose
>> of idiocy to not be able to see this. Just because we have
>> selected to group things a certain way does not mean that there
>> aren't other ways to group them. So why get all dogmatic in the
>> first place? I mean, in addition to the communications issue..

> You aren't actually

Again, as a narcissist this is sacrilegious, "Ceding power to
others." To people who aren't a head case, there's nothing to even
argue.

>> Also, it's inaccurate. The LCA was bipedal and all in but absolute
>> certainty used tools for real, not some idiot "I'm using hammer
>> as a noun, instead of 'bang' or 'whack', so that manifests the
>> noun into existence!"
> 
> What LCA? 

It's a mystery!

That's it! That's the ticket! (You headcase!)

> There seems to be no connection between

For you, the only thing that can matter is yourself.

> You seem to be assuming that technology will stay at its current state 
> forever. Why? 

Let's test if you're saying someone of any value or merely expressing
your narcissism:  Assume technology does not "stay at its current state
forever"... look around. See aliens?

Whoops!  Your opinion is yet another expression of your narcissistic
personality disorder.



-- 
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5