| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vqkqq6$sucd$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail From: JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> Newsgroups: talk.origins Subject: Re: Why the Fermi Assumption matters Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2025 15:39:50 -0400 Organization: Eek Lines: 68 Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org Message-ID: <vqkqq6$sucd$1@dont-email.me> References: <vqjdhq$juea$3@dont-email.me> <tYCdnV9V99OaVFD6nZ2dnZfqlJydnZ2d@giganews.com> Reply-To: jtem01@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89"; logging-data="93421"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:eRvo4ZroGGz7PVEBJDSKSrluC7o= Return-Path: <news@eternal-september.org> X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org id CF62F22978C; Sun, 09 Mar 2025 15:40:02 -0400 (EDT) by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91B91229783 for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Sun, 09 Mar 2025 15:40:00 -0400 (EDT) id E96DC1C0909; Sun, 9 Mar 2025 19:39:53 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org by newsfeed.bofh.team (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEB631C04FF for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Sun, 9 Mar 2025 19:39:53 +0000 (UTC) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eternal-september.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62623622AD for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Sun, 9 Mar 2025 19:39:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: name/62623622AD; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com id 26158DC01CA; Sun, 9 Mar 2025 20:39:51 +0100 (CET) X-Injection-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2025 20:39:50 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1+5VkemNAU7mtt9dOz0rdy53fU6wjsfTSg= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <tYCdnV9V99OaVFD6nZ2dnZfqlJydnZ2d@giganews.com> DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO, FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS, USER_IN_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 smtp.eternal-september.org John Harshman wrote: > But that's the purpose of the "humans are apes" idea: to emphasize our > relationships to other animals. But it's not the relationship, as I pointed out. It's mere the conventional means of categorization. >> Secondly, it's not a "Truth" but a "Convention." It's a way that >> we order things... our relationship to other animals. It's how >> we put things together in our minds to aid on our understanding. > >> It's not real. Logically, it makes just as much sense to go the >> other way: "If we are humans than our ancestors were humans and >> the LCA was a human and so on & so forth..." > > Taken to its logical conclusion, then, you would like to declare that > all of life be considered human. No. Taken with reading comprehension, I just said that the goal is to communicate not act dogmatic. As a narcissist, you must control conversations. They exist as an exercise in power, in your ego. Calling humans "Apes," though not a reality of nature but a human convention, was a barrier to communication with many creationists. And you're a narcissist, you can't cede that as you need control. >> That's actually logic. You really need to summon a healthy dose >> of idiocy to not be able to see this. Just because we have >> selected to group things a certain way does not mean that there >> aren't other ways to group them. So why get all dogmatic in the >> first place? I mean, in addition to the communications issue.. > You aren't actually Again, as a narcissist this is sacrilegious, "Ceding power to others." To people who aren't a head case, there's nothing to even argue. >> Also, it's inaccurate. The LCA was bipedal and all in but absolute >> certainty used tools for real, not some idiot "I'm using hammer >> as a noun, instead of 'bang' or 'whack', so that manifests the >> noun into existence!" > > What LCA? It's a mystery! That's it! That's the ticket! (You headcase!) > There seems to be no connection between For you, the only thing that can matter is yourself. > You seem to be assuming that technology will stay at its current state > forever. Why? Let's test if you're saying someone of any value or merely expressing your narcissism: Assume technology does not "stay at its current state forever"... look around. See aliens? Whoops! Your opinion is yet another expression of your narcissistic personality disorder. -- https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5