Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vqn4oq$1eimo$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.programming
Subject: Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust?
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 16:42:02 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <vqn4oq$1eimo$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vqmi1p$f1f$1@reader1.panix.com> <86y0xdt1li.fsf@linuxsc.com>
Reply-To: nospam.harnden@invalid.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 17:42:03 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="68e75f91d9ef5acf26d1cf14ca7d6969";
	logging-data="1526488"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX192JhFWV06DOSOoU0PnXNoFujl64L0BmgU="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:pdzbwKStZkVF42yOzaDoTER2QgQ=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <86y0xdt1li.fsf@linuxsc.com>
Bytes: 2172

On 10/03/2025 14:14, Tim Rentsch wrote:
> cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) writes:
> 
>> [Note:  Followup-To: set to news.groups.proposals]
>>
>> I'd like to open informal discussion around possibly creating a
>> new newsgroup, comp.lang.rust, for discussion of the Rust
>> programming language (https://rust-lang.org/).  Rust is a
>> compiled, type- and memory- safe language that has been in open
>> development since 2010, and is rapidly gaining adoption in
>> industry and research.  It often comes up in discussions related
>> to C and C++, but no existing group is dedicated to it.
>>
>> Thoughts?
> 
> I am in favor of creating comp.lang.rust, and hereby
> officially give Dan Cross my proxy in any voting.
> 
> If comp.lang.rust is created, I expect I will at least
> try reading it for a while.  I have had a longstanding
> interest in learning rust, and have been frustated by
> how horrible the existing explanatory materials are.

There is an alt.comp.lang.rust - but it has very little traffic - 
comp.lang.rust would be better.