Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vqn4oq$1eimo$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.programming Subject: Re: Informal discussion: comp.lang.rust? Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 16:42:02 +0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 26 Message-ID: <vqn4oq$1eimo$1@dont-email.me> References: <vqmi1p$f1f$1@reader1.panix.com> <86y0xdt1li.fsf@linuxsc.com> Reply-To: nospam.harnden@invalid.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 17:42:03 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="68e75f91d9ef5acf26d1cf14ca7d6969"; logging-data="1526488"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX192JhFWV06DOSOoU0PnXNoFujl64L0BmgU=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:pdzbwKStZkVF42yOzaDoTER2QgQ= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <86y0xdt1li.fsf@linuxsc.com> Bytes: 2172 On 10/03/2025 14:14, Tim Rentsch wrote: > cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) writes: > >> [Note: Followup-To: set to news.groups.proposals] >> >> I'd like to open informal discussion around possibly creating a >> new newsgroup, comp.lang.rust, for discussion of the Rust >> programming language (https://rust-lang.org/). Rust is a >> compiled, type- and memory- safe language that has been in open >> development since 2010, and is rapidly gaining adoption in >> industry and research. It often comes up in discussions related >> to C and C++, but no existing group is dedicated to it. >> >> Thoughts? > > I am in favor of creating comp.lang.rust, and hereby > officially give Dan Cross my proxy in any voting. > > If comp.lang.rust is created, I expect I will at least > try reading it for a while. I have had a longstanding > interest in learning rust, and have been frustated by > how horrible the existing explanatory materials are. There is an alt.comp.lang.rust - but it has very little traffic - comp.lang.rust would be better.