Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Python recompile
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 12:53:28 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <vqnfvp$1gsl4$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vq1qas$j22$1@gallifrey.nk.ca> <vq3oag$18iv6$1@dont-email.me>
 <vq4hf2$1brf7$1@dont-email.me> <vq4l3d$1ck9e$1@dont-email.me>
 <vq4m0u$1ctpn$1@dont-email.me> <vq4n05$1d5dv$1@dont-email.me>
 <vq4om7$1dbo2$2@dont-email.me> <vq6dqh$1pskk$1@dont-email.me>
 <vq6f8p$1pmnk$1@dont-email.me> <vq6gqc$1qcp8$1@dont-email.me>
 <vq6ips$1pmnk$2@dont-email.me> <vq6j5h$1qosf$1@dont-email.me>
 <20250304092827.708@kylheku.com> <vq7g1p$1vmg5$1@dont-email.me>
 <vq94dt$2boso$1@dont-email.me> <vqcsk7$23bfo$1@paganini.bofh.team>
 <vqefn1$3flpt$1@dont-email.me> <vqeu5c$3imil$1@dont-email.me>
 <vqeun4$3iqbq$1@dont-email.me> <vqfcbe$3lkkc$1@dont-email.me>
 <871pv861ht.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <20250308192940.00001351@yahoo.com>
 <vqi1ge$8jg8$1@dont-email.me> <vqibt3$ahu0$3@dont-email.me>
 <vqiibq$bq1o$7@dont-email.me> <20250309012626.00001276@yahoo.com>
 <vqiugc$dv5o$2@dont-email.me> <vql9fu$vluh$1@dont-email.me>
 <vqlfrj$10rr4$2@dont-email.me> <vqli6g$114cj$3@dont-email.me>
 <vqm0b9$179ca$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 20:53:29 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ad095adaf9d64c9163b0578a2211f0c8";
	logging-data="1602212"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19wmIDKdeZvi8HyJB2nra3WySk7j7MtAfY="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:T0VSmFtnmh+L10fMjRxx5Rk+o+A=
In-Reply-To: <vqm0b9$179ca$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3104

On 3/9/2025 11:20 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 19:18:55 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> 
>> On 3/9/2025 6:39 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 16:50:22 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>>
>>>> IOCP on WinNT 4.0. Well, I used to use it a lot. Worked well. Way back
>>>> in early 2000's.
>>>>
>>>> https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fileio/i-o-completion-ports
>>>
>>> Same limitation: note they mention named pipes, but not unnamed ones.
>>
>> No pipes. Sockets.
> 
> Named pipes and sockets are different things, even in Windows.

Fwiw, I only used IOCP with Sockets. ;^o

> 
>> Now, iirc, the client version limited IOCP to only four? in flight,
>> concurrent, TransmitFile calls at a time? The server version did no
>> do that...
> 
> Don’t you just love how Microsoft takes advantage of every opportunity
> to nickle-and-dime its customers to death ...

Oh yeah! :^) Humm... Well, shit. IIRC, there might have been a way to 
"hack" the client version into allowing more than four in flight 
TransmitFile calls...