Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vqns51$1jibk$5@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Python recompile
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 23:21:05 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <vqns51$1jibk$5@dont-email.me>
References: <vq1qas$j22$1@gallifrey.nk.ca> <vq4om7$1dbo2$2@dont-email.me>
	<vq6dqh$1pskk$1@dont-email.me> <vq6f8p$1pmnk$1@dont-email.me>
	<vq6gqc$1qcp8$1@dont-email.me> <vq6ips$1pmnk$2@dont-email.me>
	<vq6j5h$1qosf$1@dont-email.me> <20250304092827.708@kylheku.com>
	<vq7g1p$1vmg5$1@dont-email.me> <vq94dt$2boso$1@dont-email.me>
	<vqcsk7$23bfo$1@paganini.bofh.team> <vqefn1$3flpt$1@dont-email.me>
	<vqeu5c$3imil$1@dont-email.me> <vqeun4$3iqbq$1@dont-email.me>
	<vqfcbe$3lkkc$1@dont-email.me> <871pv861ht.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
	<20250308192940.00001351@yahoo.com> <vqi1ge$8jg8$1@dont-email.me>
	<vqibt3$ahu0$3@dont-email.me> <vqiibq$bq1o$7@dont-email.me>
	<20250309012626.00001276@yahoo.com> <vqiugc$dv5o$2@dont-email.me>
	<vql9fu$vluh$1@dont-email.me> <vqlfrj$10rr4$2@dont-email.me>
	<vqli6g$114cj$3@dont-email.me> <vqm0b9$179ca$1@dont-email.me>
	<vqnfvp$1gsl4$2@dont-email.me> <20250310135828.116@kylheku.com>
	<vqnkdq$1gsl4$6@dont-email.me> <vqnmbn$1i1s0$6@dont-email.me>
	<vqnmig$1ie8j$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 00:21:08 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="fb3f8814a23c1b5929be502852c6d2d1";
	logging-data="1689972"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX186wenxH/YB3tSAtW7UPetg"
User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:KAt+hbXe0abrtJs0SAwT6hC5LPo=
Bytes: 2592

On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 14:45:51 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

> On 3/10/2025 2:42 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 14:09:13 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
>>
>>> lol! IOCP is not all that bad... :^) They have an interesting
>>> function:
>>>
>>> https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/ioapiset/nf-ioapiset-getqueuedcompletionstatusex
>>
>> It’s a blocking call:
>>
>>      This function associates a thread with the specified completion
>>      port. A thread can be associated with at most one completion port.
>
> did you notice the timeout parameter?

That leads to busy-waiting.

>> So, no nondeterministic event-loop handling for you ...