| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vqns51$1jibk$5@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Python recompile Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 23:21:05 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 21 Message-ID: <vqns51$1jibk$5@dont-email.me> References: <vq1qas$j22$1@gallifrey.nk.ca> <vq4om7$1dbo2$2@dont-email.me> <vq6dqh$1pskk$1@dont-email.me> <vq6f8p$1pmnk$1@dont-email.me> <vq6gqc$1qcp8$1@dont-email.me> <vq6ips$1pmnk$2@dont-email.me> <vq6j5h$1qosf$1@dont-email.me> <20250304092827.708@kylheku.com> <vq7g1p$1vmg5$1@dont-email.me> <vq94dt$2boso$1@dont-email.me> <vqcsk7$23bfo$1@paganini.bofh.team> <vqefn1$3flpt$1@dont-email.me> <vqeu5c$3imil$1@dont-email.me> <vqeun4$3iqbq$1@dont-email.me> <vqfcbe$3lkkc$1@dont-email.me> <871pv861ht.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <20250308192940.00001351@yahoo.com> <vqi1ge$8jg8$1@dont-email.me> <vqibt3$ahu0$3@dont-email.me> <vqiibq$bq1o$7@dont-email.me> <20250309012626.00001276@yahoo.com> <vqiugc$dv5o$2@dont-email.me> <vql9fu$vluh$1@dont-email.me> <vqlfrj$10rr4$2@dont-email.me> <vqli6g$114cj$3@dont-email.me> <vqm0b9$179ca$1@dont-email.me> <vqnfvp$1gsl4$2@dont-email.me> <20250310135828.116@kylheku.com> <vqnkdq$1gsl4$6@dont-email.me> <vqnmbn$1i1s0$6@dont-email.me> <vqnmig$1ie8j$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 00:21:08 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="fb3f8814a23c1b5929be502852c6d2d1"; logging-data="1689972"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX186wenxH/YB3tSAtW7UPetg" User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk) Cancel-Lock: sha1:KAt+hbXe0abrtJs0SAwT6hC5LPo= Bytes: 2592 On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 14:45:51 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > On 3/10/2025 2:42 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > >> On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 14:09:13 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >> >>> lol! IOCP is not all that bad... :^) They have an interesting >>> function: >>> >>> https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/ioapiset/nf-ioapiset-getqueuedcompletionstatusex >> >> It’s a blocking call: >> >> This function associates a thread with the specified completion >> port. A thread can be associated with at most one completion port. > > did you notice the timeout parameter? That leads to busy-waiting. >> So, no nondeterministic event-loop handling for you ...