Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vqnsub$1jg04$3@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: bike path news
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 19:34:34 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <vqnsub$1jg04$3@dont-email.me>
References: <vqkd4f$q5vb$1@dont-email.me>
 <gmjrsjdel67386h5q8dq93fvttdl7foq8g@4ax.com> <vqkke7$rjrf$1@dont-email.me>
 <8plrsjh8vcsu9srdm0crpkuaingdlipc22@4ax.com> <vqla8n$1018u$1@dont-email.me>
 <m37mnjFnuacU1@mid.individual.net>
 <n5ctsj5f26f33tmsoruj8tn1blv4m3p485@4ax.com>
 <m380knFpcjbU1@mid.individual.net> <vqmp60$1c163$4@dont-email.me>
 <m38899FqfumU1@mid.individual.net> <vqmqt2$1c163$5@dont-email.me>
 <vqn05t$1die7$2@dont-email.me> <vqnblh$1fvjp$2@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: frkrygow@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 00:34:36 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ae9ae6aa58ef70674366048bcffd2451";
	logging-data="1687556"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Ruv/Ct2r2h18+jHpJxqxyrDbqQczx0qM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:LJWMQ6PG6OYibPegKM5+KDF/ZJU=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vqnblh$1fvjp$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2792

On 3/10/2025 2:39 PM, AMuzi wrote:
> On 3/10/2025 10:23 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
>> On 3/10/2025 9:53 AM, AMuzi wrote:
>>>
>>> Valid opinions are based in supporting data.
>>
>> Wait... I thought I read here that everything is subjective, or 
>> something like that!
> 
> Nope, not from me.

Quoting your timid ally: "most everything *IS* subjective for people who 
don't believe everything they're told."

A person who accepted that would have to say that your data on increased 
gun ownership is actually true only for some people. And conversely, it 
would actually be simultaneously false for other people.

And I don't think he's so sophisticated as to try to  macroscopically 
apply Schroedinger's Cat - which would be silly enough.

> Things which have actually happened can actually recur. 

Sure. Applying a force to a mass can cause it to accelerate, time after 
time. Applying heat to a mass of metal can cause it to increase in 
temperature, and that can certainly recur.

But your "intellectual" buddy would say "No, correlation does not imply 
causation" and "most everything is subjective." It's his version of 
"Ommmmm, nothing can be known, all is mystery."

Please have him wrap his bare hand around a frame joint you've just 
finished brazing.

-- 
- Frank Krygowski