| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vqnsub$1jg04$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: bike path news Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 19:34:34 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 36 Message-ID: <vqnsub$1jg04$3@dont-email.me> References: <vqkd4f$q5vb$1@dont-email.me> <gmjrsjdel67386h5q8dq93fvttdl7foq8g@4ax.com> <vqkke7$rjrf$1@dont-email.me> <8plrsjh8vcsu9srdm0crpkuaingdlipc22@4ax.com> <vqla8n$1018u$1@dont-email.me> <m37mnjFnuacU1@mid.individual.net> <n5ctsj5f26f33tmsoruj8tn1blv4m3p485@4ax.com> <m380knFpcjbU1@mid.individual.net> <vqmp60$1c163$4@dont-email.me> <m38899FqfumU1@mid.individual.net> <vqmqt2$1c163$5@dont-email.me> <vqn05t$1die7$2@dont-email.me> <vqnblh$1fvjp$2@dont-email.me> Reply-To: frkrygow@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 00:34:36 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ae9ae6aa58ef70674366048bcffd2451"; logging-data="1687556"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Ruv/Ct2r2h18+jHpJxqxyrDbqQczx0qM=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:LJWMQ6PG6OYibPegKM5+KDF/ZJU= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <vqnblh$1fvjp$2@dont-email.me> Bytes: 2792 On 3/10/2025 2:39 PM, AMuzi wrote: > On 3/10/2025 10:23 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote: >> On 3/10/2025 9:53 AM, AMuzi wrote: >>> >>> Valid opinions are based in supporting data. >> >> Wait... I thought I read here that everything is subjective, or >> something like that! > > Nope, not from me. Quoting your timid ally: "most everything *IS* subjective for people who don't believe everything they're told." A person who accepted that would have to say that your data on increased gun ownership is actually true only for some people. And conversely, it would actually be simultaneously false for other people. And I don't think he's so sophisticated as to try to macroscopically apply Schroedinger's Cat - which would be silly enough. > Things which have actually happened can actually recur. Sure. Applying a force to a mass can cause it to accelerate, time after time. Applying heat to a mass of metal can cause it to increase in temperature, and that can certainly recur. But your "intellectual" buddy would say "No, correlation does not imply causation" and "most everything is subjective." It's his version of "Ommmmm, nothing can be known, all is mystery." Please have him wrap his bare hand around a frame joint you've just finished brazing. -- - Frank Krygowski