Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vqo05a$1kf0u$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org>
Newsgroups: alt.usage.english,sci.physics
Subject: Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the
 bunkum of quantum
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 11:29:28 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 70
Message-ID: <vqo05a$1kf0u$1@dont-email.me>
References: <29ddba74afd0cdddbd9fbef17243485e@www.novabbs.com>
 <2937ffa1c63968d4b00621247540b721@www.novabbs.com>
 <vqfvbu$3pesl$2@dont-email.me> <vqg514$3qdc5$1@dont-email.me>
 <1b8634e8fc31423132450161b2ad982e@www.novabbs.com>
 <de8b343039f25de18d931ba08ec830a8@www.novabbs.com>
 <vqii28$brqv$1@dont-email.me> <vqjo8h$lsno$1@dont-email.me>
 <d95900145784cfad3e255b531e15d986@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 01:29:31 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="fe4c097d0975e1ed284d9353595b0403";
	logging-data="1719326"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19bpFkGrOvBR1auz3tTs4mN"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; Warp 4.5; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.8.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:sC3/+4dfCHGQElRb81LkMmioDXQ=
In-Reply-To: <d95900145784cfad3e255b531e15d986@www.novabbs.com>
Bytes: 4684

On 11/03/25 06:54, jerryfriedman wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 9:50:06 +0000, Peter Moylan wrote:
>
>> On 09/03/25 09:58, Phil wrote:
>>> On 08/03/2025 22:46, Bertietaylor wrote:
>>
>>>>>> It's just as implausible as the suggestion (easily
>>>>>> disproved) that the pressure is zero at the centre of the
>>>>>> earth.
>>>>>
>>>>> The pressure is most certainly zero at the centre of the
>>>>> stars and planets. Read a first year book on physics.
>>>>
>>>> Which will say that within an enclosed surface with mass the
>>>> net gravitational force or pressure is zero.
>>
>> Read that first year book yourself. Did you find the words "or
>> pressure"? No, I didn't think so. You've tried to conclude
>> something about the pressure from the gravitational force. That
>> doesn't work, because they are different quantities.
>>
>> Gravitational force, like all forces, is a vector quantity. It has
>> a magnitude and a direction. That makes it possible that a number
>> of nonzero vectors can sum to zero; and, indeed, that is what
>> happens inside a spherical shell.
>>
>> Pressure is a scalar. If you add two pressures, you get a higher
>> pressure. There's no such thing as a negative pressure to cancel
>> out the first pressure.
>>
>> Think of a cone, or similar shape, whose point is at the centre of
>> the earth. You can separate out a section with thickness dr, and
>> write down the force balance equation for that slab. (This, too, is
>> first year physics.) From that you get a differential equation for
>> the pressure as a function of radius. No matter what
>> simplifications you make, you will get the same conclusion: the
>> deeper you go, the higher the pressure. Which is something that
>> ocean divers can confirm from their own experience.
>
> Even swimming pool divers.
>
>> At the centre of the earth, the gravitational force is zero but
>> the pressure is at a maximum.
>>
>>> Presumably, by an analogous argument, the pressure at the centre
>>> of a balloon is also zero?
>>
>> Actually, the gravitational force at the centre of a balloon is
>> zero, if you count only the force due to the balloon itself. But of
>> course, you do have to count the attraction from the earth as
>> well.
>>
>> Either way, what you conclude about the gravitational force says
>> nothing about the pressure. They're different quantities.
>
> They're different, but they are connected.  Since the gravitational
> force at the center of the Earth is 0, you can conclude that the
> pressure /gradient/ there is 0.  Hint to Arindam.

Re-reading this thread, I have suddenly realised what has misled
Arindam. He keeps using "force" and "gravitational force" as if they
were interchangeable. Not all forces are gravitational forces; and to
calculate pressure you have to add up all the forces, not just the
gravitational component. At the centre of the earth, you also have to
taken into account the radially directed non-gravitational  force that
comes from the weight of all the rocks (and so on) above your head.

-- 
Peter Moylan       peter@pmoylan.org    http://www.pmoylan.org
Newcastle, NSW