Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vqpm42$2221u$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Pancho <Pancho.Jones@protonmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: More systemdCrap
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 15:50:25 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <vqpm42$2221u$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vqn41l$1efis$1@dont-email.me> <vqna2v$1fks2$1@dont-email.me>
 <vqnbm7$1g56j$1@dont-email.me> <gjo3alxe38.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
 <vqnja1$1hrbi$1@dont-email.me> <rq44alxv4u.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
 <20250310152856.00004b5a@gmail.com> <vqoqfk$1s78c$3@dont-email.me>
 <op.228vudbda3w0dxdave@hodgins.homeip.net> <vqpinq$210sd$5@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 16:50:27 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="11bffce6b6aecc3d80deb806213bdf21";
	logging-data="2164798"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18QiB5EbMoXfd4fZfRG2IwmqIa3THXQa0E="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:61Jyq6kR6JFv17DJAmhGPnx2MDo=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <vqpinq$210sd$5@dont-email.me>

On 3/11/25 14:52, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 11/03/2025 12:33, David W. Hodgins wrote:
>> On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 03:58:44 -0400, The Natural Philosopher 
>> <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/03/2025 22:28, John Ames wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 23:14:19 +0100
>>>> "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Nothing is broken, it has been intentionally designed this way
>>>>
>>>> Okay, sure - but that design is stupid.
>>>>
>>> Exactly.
>>>
>>> Journalctl should be able to take the One True Logfile and scan it,
>>> rewriting items to be retained and discarding items to be deleted .
>>
>> In other words make it as easy as possible for an inttruder to cover 
>> any trace of their
>> activities.
>>
>> Great log that would be for determining what an intruder did.
>>
> Dont you think any intruder would not already have written a journalctl 
> to do exactly that?
> Sheesh
>

Carlos has already suggested that there might be a method to 
cryptographically sign the logs, making alterations very difficult, even 
to a privileged user.

The basic pattern for immutable audit logs is mature due to the 
requirements of financial systems. Whether systemd have implemented a 
reliable system or not, I don't know, but they could.



>> Regards, Dave Hodgins
>