| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vqqq1n$29buv$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Very Stupid Mistake Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 21:03:35 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 32 Message-ID: <vqqq1n$29buv$1@dont-email.me> References: <vqntaq$1jut5$1@dont-email.me> <vqp388$1tvqa$1@dont-email.me> <vqpdv9$202b2$2@dont-email.me> <vqperb$20c9k$2@dont-email.me> <E6mcnWv3nMa66036nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <vqqnk5$28jtr$1@dont-email.me> <vqqonm$28lh2$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 03:03:36 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="da28212957632e1bc35b68d4fbc88507"; logging-data="2404319"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/lT/dYcZdJBf9acmnz+r3a" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:PxecOAAt4yJPjqhwR+qp1ENXiNU= X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250311-4, 3/11/2025), Outbound message In-Reply-To: <vqqonm$28lh2$1@dont-email.me> X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2403 On 3/11/2025 8:41 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote: > On 12/03/2025 01:22, olcott wrote: >> DDD correctly simulated by HHH never reaches its >> own "return" instruction and terminates normally >> in any finite or infinite number of correctly >> simulated steps. > > If it correctly simulates infinitely many steps, it doesn't terminate. > Look up "infinite". > *It was dishonest of you to remove this context* On 3/11/2025 12:42 PM, Mike Terry wrote: > (Even though it demonstrably DOES halt if not > aborted and simulated further. That statement is stupidly false. > But your task is to decide for /any/ program, not just DDD. No you have this WRONG. My WHOLE effort has been to correctly determine the halt status of the conventional halting problem proof's "impossible" input. This by itself is better than anyone else has ever done with this proof since it was first presented 89 years ago. -- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer