| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vqr08v$2e4bo$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Very Stupid
Mistake and Liars
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 03:49:51 +0000
Organization: Fix this later
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <vqr08v$2e4bo$3@dont-email.me>
References: <vqntaq$1jut5$1@dont-email.me> <vqp388$1tvqa$1@dont-email.me>
<vqpdv9$202b2$2@dont-email.me> <vqperb$20c9k$2@dont-email.me>
<E6mcnWv3nMa66036nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
<vqqnk5$28jtr$1@dont-email.me> <vqqonm$28lh2$1@dont-email.me>
<vqqq09$28kp8$1@dont-email.me> <vqqq7s$29buv$2@dont-email.me>
<vqqrin$28lh2$4@dont-email.me> <vqqros$29meg$3@dont-email.me>
<vqqrqf$29k3n$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 04:49:52 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1e46a42d02300691bd0ac693a83620d5";
logging-data="2560376"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+b3I0NwP8HhxGjhbPPXuz2GbAhz6yx52q+HHdno409rg=="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:YR8kT4lQ2NHQoCX9DbwyyMWD+q0=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <vqqrqf$29k3n$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2331
On 12/03/2025 02:33, dbush wrote:
> On 3/11/2025 10:33 PM, olcott wrote:
<snip>
>> Replacing the code of HHH with an unconditional simulator and
>> subsequently running HHH(DD) cannot
>> possibly f-cking halt no f-cking matter what.
>>
>
> Obviously, so what's the next step?
To show that it provides the correct answer for other functions.
This he has not yet done. Of course, it's not impossible to get a
few right...
int halts(void(*p)())
{
return 1;
}
will produce the right answer most of the time, but it's hardly a
plausible way to overturn Turing's paper. OP's decision program
has to get it right /every/ time. One failure proves that Olcott
is wrong.
--
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within