Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.spitfire.i.gajendra.net!not-for-mail
From: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 09:14:35 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID: <vqrj9r$ia4$2@reader1.panix.com>
References: <87h640gvyr.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <86h63yub2r.fsf@linuxsc.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 09:14:35 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="spitfire.i.gajendra.net:166.84.136.80";
	logging-data="18756"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross)
Bytes: 1368
Lines: 13

In article <86h63yub2r.fsf@linuxsc.com>,
Tim Rentsch  <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> wrote:
>I am in favor of reviving comp.lang.c.moderated, and hope a
>suitable moderating arrangement can be found.
>
>Technical question:  is it feasible to have moderating duties
>be shared among several people on some sort of rotating basis?
>I have no experience moderating a usenet news group.

It is; or at least it is possible to set up a pool to share the
responsibility.  I understand the software is often a bit janky
and may need some work.

	-Dan C.