| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vqroon$2iijm$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.nobody.at!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeds.news.ox.ac.uk!news.ox.ac.uk!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.xcski.com!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail From: Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: talk.origins Subject: =?utf-8?Q?Re:_Observe_the_trend._It=E2=80=99s_happening._Give_it_time.?= Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 11:47:50 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 50 Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org Message-ID: <vqroon$2iijm$1@dont-email.me> References: <vq8k3n$29ai1$1@dont-email.me> <vqar6h$2lnbh$1@dont-email.me> <vqehpj$3g1ui$1@dont-email.me> <vqghcq$41r$1@dont-email.me> <af429d58c8a8f999cc9c5b674a54e8c4@www.novabbs.com> <vqohqc$1qn8i$1@dont-email.me> <846a8431496562385fc3e83484712749@www.novabbs.com> <vqp9lr$1vbsh$1@dont-email.me> <269b7313de05ced18d3f67cec741b949@www.novabbs.com> <vqralh$2fuat$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89"; logging-data="95570"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org" User-Agent: Unison/2.2 To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:XL9icY8Y//7IUDz9mBQzVsuIwBU= Return-Path: <news@eternal-september.org> X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org id 2803122978C; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 06:48:04 -0400 (EDT) by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E05D1229783 for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 06:48:01 -0400 (EDT) id 47D2F1C0C36; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 10:47:54 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org by newsfeed.bofh.team (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B1221C0847 for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 10:47:54 +0000 (UTC) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eternal-september.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D84F622AC for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 10:47:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: name/2D84F622AC; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=yahoo.com id ED7E8DC01CA; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 11:47:51 +0100 (CET) X-Injection-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 11:47:51 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX18MDk8hIpKv/D1dcYTrDkfmOHxRSHWuxDBdmi+Txc++UQ== DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_WELCOMELIST, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 smtp.eternal-september.org On 2025-03-12 06:47:10 +0000, MarkE said: [ … ] > > Look, we'll probably always strongly disagree, but a rhetorical boxing > match is at the expense of interesting discussion. I am willing to > examine the less certain aspects of my own position. > > 1. I've been quite open about being a mainstream Christian, I'm curious as to how you define a mainstream Christian. Is Martin, a Roman Catholic, a mainstream Christian? Is Ron, a Methodist, a mainstream Christian? Was I, when I was an Anglican, a mainstream Christian? Was Theodosius Dobzhansky, a practising Eastern Orthodox Christian, a mainstream Christian? Or do you just mean someone who follows Southern Baptist orthodoxy? > therefore belief in an omniscient designer is assumed. The only reason > I mentioned it here was to contrast solution space access, even at risk > of stating the obvious. Not sure what your concern with this is? > > 2. As I said above, you interpreted me to be saying "that evolution HAS > to explore ALL available search space." I clarified that my meaning was > not that, but rather the postulate "that evolution would NOT be able to > explore all available search space." Do you accept this? > > 3. I can appreciate there is some frustration in relation to the "what, > why, where, and how" questions. I'm not actively avoiding them, and > have given some broad suggestions here and there. > > An example I've give before is this: it is entirely valid to seek to > show that human induced global warming is a real problem, regardless of > whether or not you have a solution. Similarly, it is entirely valid to > seek to show that naturalistic explanations of origins are inadequate, > regardless of whether or not you offer an alternative hypothesis. That > would in and of itself be of profound importance and value. Offering an > alternative hypothesis (naturalistic or supernatural) would be also be > of profound importance and value, but not necessary to validate the > former. > > Open to exploring this further. -- Athel -- French and British, living in Marseilles for 38 years; mainly in England until 1987.