| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vqu7mo$36136$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 11:15:04 +0200 Organization: - Lines: 34 Message-ID: <vqu7mo$36136$1@dont-email.me> References: <vqntaq$1jut5$1@dont-email.me> <vqp388$1tvqa$1@dont-email.me> <vqpdv9$202b2$2@dont-email.me> <vqperb$20c9k$2@dont-email.me> <vqpqkq$22qmv$2@dont-email.me> <vqrkng$2hpcu$1@dont-email.me> <vqrln9$2frof$6@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 10:15:05 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f99cbdcb742dbbadce7ebf2bb40c7ee7"; logging-data="3343462"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18d4lOhCHAPlkfTo/cQaF3I" User-Agent: Unison/2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:StOm06T6jHs5bc+3sRwV7CO/f2E= Bytes: 2286 On 2025-03-12 09:55:53 +0000, Richard Heathfield said: > On 12/03/2025 09:38, Mikko wrote: >> On 2025-03-11 17:07:38 +0000, olcott said: >> > > <snip> > > >>> You still sound like Richard Damon whom is unable to >>> understand that semantic tautologies are irrefutable. >> >> That a false claim about one person is similar to a false >> claim about another is not suffecent ro conclude or even >> sustpect that they are the same. A better measure is how meny >> indignificant typos each makes. > > Quite so. > > And while we're on the subject of semantics, the OP seems unaware that > he can't use stipulative definitions to define away the difficult parts > of a problem. At best, he can stipulatively define a /new/ problem, but > by redefining terms he steps away from the original problem. He can > argue till he's blue in the face about the Olcott Problem, but he is no > longer saying anything meaningful about the Halting Problem or the Linz > proof thereof. He has moved away from the orignal problems long ago. What "every sufficiently competent C programmer knows" is fairly uninteresting and irrelevant to the original problems. -- Mikko