| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vqv1us$3eapv$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 17:43:08 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <vqv1us$3eapv$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vqrbtd$1chb7$2@solani.org> <vqrn89$u9t$1@news.muc.de>
<vqrp47$2gl70$1@dont-email.me> <vqrtn3$1uq5$1@news.muc.de>
<vqs1og$2k7oh$2@dont-email.me> <vqsh1r$2cnf$1@news.muc.de>
<vqsoq5$2p6pb$1@dont-email.me> <vqsuf0$2g64$1@news.muc.de>
<8734fghp5m.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 17:43:09 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ed22730a009f65a5192a721e5374f938";
logging-data="3615551"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18tiDiSIc4LWcIahTo6JEdOFTdsjMzv5ws="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:i1SprVVUfnefW0N9eaVlWrJ99dE=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <8734fghp5m.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
Bytes: 2020
On 13.03.2025 17:27, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
> WMaths does (apparently) have one result that is not a theorem of modern
> mathematics. In WMaths there sets P and E such that
>
> E in P and P \ {E} = P
That is caused by potential infinity. The sets or better collections are
not fixed.
>
> WM himself called this a "surprise" but unfortunately he has never been
> able to offer a proof.
Much more surprising is the idea that all natural numbers can be
subtracted from ℕ with nothing remaining
ℕ \ {1, 2, 3, ...} = { }.
But when we explicitly subtract only numbers which have ℵo remainders
∀n ∈ ℕ_def: |ℕ \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n}| = ℵo
then by magic spell also all remainders vanish.
Otherwise U(FISONs) = ℕ ==> Ø = ℕ.
Regards, WM