Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: dbush <dbush.mobile@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Very Stupid
 Mistake or Liars
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 16:46:01 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <vqvg68$3kfru$4@dont-email.me>
References: <vqntaq$1jut5$1@dont-email.me> <vqqrin$28lh2$4@dont-email.me>
 <vqs9ck$2lqb2$1@dont-email.me> <vqud4e$36e14$3@dont-email.me>
 <vqueuk$idv$1@reader1.panix.com> <vqunb6$392on$1@dont-email.me>
 <vquo43$39p4p$1@dont-email.me> <vqus5u$3cfil$1@dont-email.me>
 <vqusem$3clv8$1@dont-email.me> <vqutlf$3dmpj$1@dont-email.me>
 <vquu4r$3clv8$2@dont-email.me> <vqvfsf$3s1qt$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 21:46:01 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a54c008eec5b2f1783ae744a985360b6";
	logging-data="3817342"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+fq+OuuE7pTnnmmUGw5/du"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:CaOlMAVwD+vuxfXOKnOveuwPBsw=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vqvfsf$3s1qt$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2653

On 3/13/2025 4:40 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 3/13/2025 10:38 AM, dbush wrote:
>> On 3/13/2025 11:29 AM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 3/13/2025 10:09 AM, dbush wrote:
>>>> On 3/13/2025 11:04 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>> void DDD()
>>>>> {
>>>>>    HHH(DDD);
>>>>>    return;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> When HHH correctly emulates N steps of the
>>>>> above DDD it cannot possibly reach its own
>>>>> "return" instruction and terminate normally.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Irrelevant, as that's not what the halting problem is about.
>>>>
>>>
>>> We cannot possibly get to how that is relevant to the
>>> problem UNTIL AFTER YOU FIRST ACKNOWLEDGE THAT IT IS TRUE.
>>
>> It's irrelevant because it's not the question.
>>
>>
> 
> In other words you will make sure to not
> agree with anything I say because your
> primary goal is disagreement.
> 

In other words, you agree that it's irrelevant but don't want to admit 
it so you just dodge.

As you yourself said:

On 11/10/2024 10:11 AM, olcott wrote:
 > If you had a basis in reasoning to show that I was wrong
 > on this specific point you could provide it. You have no
 > basis in reasoning on this specific point all you have is
 > presumption.