Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vr0frm$msmi$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: two drums
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 16:46:18 +1100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 44
Message-ID: <vr0frm$msmi$1@dont-email.me>
References: <4bs1tj5ua7r2kbcs8na9ij37pn3rk5dqbn@4ax.com>
 <prg5tj1a8smkvu27fs1t0lmav5gcnhl0mf@4ax.com>
 <lrq5tjpmk6bd3na42osevimmdaf6obbt55@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 06:46:34 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ff3022b65d8a3991bfddd3dff4e336b2";
	logging-data="750290"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18PAqRRstYxXn/2Id5DOwNVYnvgeYywBKY="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:xc2IBVMJ2El3Ok2eBPAXqAQCkYA=
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250314-0, 14/3/2025), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
In-Reply-To: <lrq5tjpmk6bd3na42osevimmdaf6obbt55@4ax.com>
Bytes: 3142

On 14/03/2025 1:41 am, john larkin wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 07:42:28 -0400, legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 19:35:38 -0700, john larkin <jlArbor.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/qpfhkvbfig7elysx78lq3/ALGqgMaRq1tx8aIiN3p1TfM?rlkey=36bcqfdb9di22ko48j89vocut&dl=0
>>>
>>> If I put two of these drum core inductors close together, and get the
>>> phasing right, I get an extra 5 mH for free, without any more ESR. And
>>> external mag fields drop too, I think.
>>
>> Check ripple and transient load response (load one - measure the
>> other).
>>
>> If chanels not synchronized at the switching frequency, odd results
>> might be seen at mixing frequency.
>>
>> RL
> 
> The two inductors will be in the two legs of, basically, a floating
> power supply, to decouple it from whatever customer impedance. So I'll
> be running the exact same current through both inductors. If I get the
> polarities right, I get the bonus inductance and the far-field
> magnetic cancellation.
> 
> I don't want signal coupling to other channels on the same board, so
> the field cancellation benefit is squared. That overcomes some
> peoples' objections to unshielded drum cores.
> 
> The physics is kinda weird. The 5 mH per inductor uses the universe
> for its energy storage, but the bonus L is energy stored in ferrite, I
> guess. I just invented the semi-shielded inductor.

It doesn't use the whole universe - just the bit in the immediate 
vicinity of the inductor. The bonus L comes from the field lines that go 
through the adjacent ferrite. A inductor wound onto a toroid can be 
completely shielded - but only if the winding is non-progressive.
Something wound around a pot core is less perfectly shielded, so the 
semi-shielded inductor was invented a long time before people realised 
that toroidal cores were a good thing.

-- 
Bill Sloman, Sydney