| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vr2oqr$2hjmt$4@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Python recompile Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 02:31:55 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 9 Message-ID: <vr2oqr$2hjmt$4@dont-email.me> References: <vq1qas$j22$1@gallifrey.nk.ca> <vqli6g$114cj$3@dont-email.me> <vqm0b9$179ca$1@dont-email.me> <vqnfvp$1gsl4$2@dont-email.me> <20250310135828.116@kylheku.com> <vqnkdq$1gsl4$6@dont-email.me> <vqnmbn$1i1s0$6@dont-email.me> <vqnmig$1ie8j$2@dont-email.me> <vqns51$1jibk$5@dont-email.me> <vqo5hd$1lant$1@dont-email.me> <vqo9df$1ls6a$2@dont-email.me> <vqoe8o$1qblf$1@dont-email.me> <vqolqv$1rfnf$5@dont-email.me> <vqq8v2$262gq$1@dont-email.me> <vqqf3r$273mt$6@dont-email.me> <vqqjra$286h8$2@dont-email.me> <vqqlff$28fls$7@dont-email.me> <vqqtjv$2a3dv$1@dont-email.me> <vqqu21$2a18r$3@dont-email.me> <vqr25u$2eit2$1@dont-email.me> <vqras6$2fsqk$1@dont-email.me> <vqtq8v$33itc$1@dont-email.me> <vqvfl6$3rsid$2@dont-email.me> <vqvqmq$49pc$1@dont-email.me> <vr01sp$9jrt$2@dont-email.me> <vr212d$1uc77$1@dont-email.me> <vr26ih$23hho$1@dont-email.me> <vr299n$25gok$1@dont-email.me> <vr2ckr$2872d$2@dont-email.me> <vr2dts$29d9l$1@dont-email.me> <vr2e4v$29d9l$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 03:31:56 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7c9322988cd10723f336ea9799d3e4e4"; logging-data="2674397"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19CRdJcS3lnJ2iemk1sCJv5" User-Agent: Pan/0.162 (Pokrosvk) Cancel-Lock: sha1:uSV7pt/DnXF4FpnS/drBhmcrGUI= Bytes: 2285 On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 16:29:34 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > There is a way to tell IOCP to do a so-called "zero byte > receive" where it does not use any non-paged memory for the receive > buffer because it's zero. Then when IOCP completes it means you are > guaranteed a non-blocking receive call, pretty nice! Not sure why you need such a roundabout trick just to get a nonblocking version of an I/O call.