Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vr79aj$2ctvq$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: hefty data sheet
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2025 20:37:55 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <vr79aj$2ctvq$2@dont-email.me>
References: <2lb9tjpf65m1p014jnnpo9f79pc40ouh7a@4ax.com>
 <67d5cd05$0$2786$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
 <3elbtjp44jl57apddeik3mn5i9o56jd9jt@4ax.com> <vr65hu$1gp4g$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2025 20:37:55 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ce2b46b594d23845aaad7de5e79b8cd4";
	logging-data="2521082"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19R3uSgdw/zk6br5ninMPmg"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.13.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Lg07Nan/qPr+dGQlDJUBNrDJQ/0=
Content-Language: en-US, fr-FR, nl-NL
In-Reply-To: <vr65hu$1gp4g$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2222

On 3/16/25 10:27, Martin Brown wrote:
> On 15/03/2025 19:39, john larkin wrote:
>> On Sat, 15 Mar 2025 14:56:25 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/14/2025 6:34 PM, john larkin wrote:
>>>> https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/spruim2
>>>>
>>>> That's 10419 pages. Has anyone seen a bigger data sheet?
>>>>
>>>> And what's a spruim?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I need a printed copy to put on someone's desk when they says "8 bit is
>>> obsolete, just use an ARM"
>>
>> If you print on both sides, the stack will be about 2 feet high.
>> Better buy some toner things.
> 
> Perhaps they are trying for the Guinness Book of Records?
> Longest meaningless datasheet.
> 
>> It would take an army of engineers to use a chip like that. That would
>> need a giant market.
> 
> I think there is a lot of duplication from a (very) quick scan.
> IOW the authors were paid by the word.
> 

Don't you guys simply look for another chip if the manual is
too much to digest?

I would.

Jeroen Belleman