| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vr79aj$2ctvq$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: hefty data sheet Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2025 20:37:55 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 36 Message-ID: <vr79aj$2ctvq$2@dont-email.me> References: <2lb9tjpf65m1p014jnnpo9f79pc40ouh7a@4ax.com> <67d5cd05$0$2786$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <3elbtjp44jl57apddeik3mn5i9o56jd9jt@4ax.com> <vr65hu$1gp4g$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2025 20:37:55 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ce2b46b594d23845aaad7de5e79b8cd4"; logging-data="2521082"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19R3uSgdw/zk6br5ninMPmg" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:Lg07Nan/qPr+dGQlDJUBNrDJQ/0= Content-Language: en-US, fr-FR, nl-NL In-Reply-To: <vr65hu$1gp4g$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 2222 On 3/16/25 10:27, Martin Brown wrote: > On 15/03/2025 19:39, john larkin wrote: >> On Sat, 15 Mar 2025 14:56:25 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote: >> >>> On 3/14/2025 6:34 PM, john larkin wrote: >>>> https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/spruim2 >>>> >>>> That's 10419 pages. Has anyone seen a bigger data sheet? >>>> >>>> And what's a spruim? >>>> >>> >>> I need a printed copy to put on someone's desk when they says "8 bit is >>> obsolete, just use an ARM" >> >> If you print on both sides, the stack will be about 2 feet high. >> Better buy some toner things. > > Perhaps they are trying for the Guinness Book of Records? > Longest meaningless datasheet. > >> It would take an army of engineers to use a chip like that. That would >> need a giant market. > > I think there is a lot of duplication from a (very) quick scan. > IOW the authors were paid by the word. > Don't you guys simply look for another chip if the manual is too much to digest? I would. Jeroen Belleman