Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: The non-existence of "dark numbers"
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 06:10:23 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <vr8arv$3dccd$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vqrbtd$1chb7$2@solani.org> <vqsuf0$2g64$1@news.muc.de>
 <vqucdi$36bb4$1@dont-email.me> <vqukqm$19g3$1@news.muc.de>
 <vqv0gq$3eapu$1@dont-email.me> <vqv62q$18mn$2@news.muc.de>
 <vr169k$18k4i$1@dont-email.me> <vr1bav$p45$1@news.muc.de>
 <vr1e8i$1er2v$1@dont-email.me> <vr1hig$5qt$1@news.muc.de>
 <vr29g3$23fi7$3@dont-email.me> <vr2d3k$jli$1@news.muc.de>
 <vr3fbu$1gbs1$3@solani.org> <vr3pvd$20r1$1@news.muc.de>
 <vr4cgl$3qbcs$3@dont-email.me> <vr6fgl$1uok$1@news.muc.de>
 <vr6tit$21dt9$1@dont-email.me> <vr71ea$qjf$1@news.muc.de>
 <vr774e$2a6rj$2@dont-email.me> <vr7ma8$2onbj$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 06:10:24 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="91883810023d13cac2329fd5614bd4f4";
	logging-data="3584397"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18RGPlDOkA4rJ8FFW4UH+Nwn1FY6ENodUE="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:zqplAobQOW73JnUUHXala+yLOgQ=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vr7ma8$2onbj$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2030

On 17.03.2025 00:19, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 3/16/2025 12:00 PM, WM wrote:

>> No. The definable natural numbers strive to the smallest infinite 
>> number ω. But they are never there.
> 
> What is wrong with you? N is all the natural numbers. Saying all does 
> not mean finite... Name a natural number that cannot be defined?

The number next to ω cannot be defined.

Regards, WM