Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vra1hl$t6n0$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android,misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: Encryption comes to RCS at last on iPhones.
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 13:43:32 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <vra1hl$t6n0$1@dont-email.me>
References: <qt6malx5hr.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
 <vra10v$2676$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 21:43:33 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4e998969fbbce7e787842b10fe971a46";
	logging-data="957152"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX187Vr8KQSxM9fjT9o/Z++7iwFOvd0yVUoY="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:QPgCzhhLBjYJ0mDBNyYn0u86HHA=
Content-Language: en-CA
In-Reply-To: <vra10v$2676$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>

On 2025-03-17 13:34, Marion wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 19:40:26 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote :
> 
>> Texting a Green Bubble will feel as native as engaging another iPhone 
>> user on iMessage.
> 
> While this is welcome news, my instant reaction was "OMG", Apple was
> forced, finally, to make their iPhone begin to work in the real world.

"Forced"?

By whom?

> 
> This is going to fundamentally impact Apple's strategy of never testing the
> iPhone in the real world (which is one reason why iOS is so damn buggy).

Look: more assertions for the "man" who claims he only states facts.

:-)

> 
> But more than the impact of having to test an iPhone with other phones,
> Apple is slowly being forced to do what's right for its customer base.
 > > No wonder Federighi said there's nothing that terrifies him more 
than Apple
> actually working in the real world when he was asked about this long ago.

Apple never had a problem with the concept of RCS...

....but didn't want its encryption to be controlled by one company.