Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vrbe7v$3vvr$4@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: zen cycle <funkmasterxx@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Job Offer
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 05:26:21 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 76
Message-ID: <vrbe7v$3vvr$4@dont-email.me>
References: <4GYAP.668109$_N6e.410994@fx17.iad> <vr1umv$1ssav$1@dont-email.me>
 <vr207a$1c7fg$1@dont-email.me> <JJ%AP.102161$3pn5.15133@fx44.iad>
 <vr22ot$1c7fh$7@dont-email.me> <8qk9tj9ntgqmuaf0nbri8m2lgv36orp7j9@4ax.com>
 <buDBP.757372$_N6e.165434@fx17.iad> <vr92pj$12sj$2@dont-email.me>
 <FI_BP.79967$J3s7.19381@fx05.iad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 10:26:23 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="77825c9042b80d3df6a6783560242a0e";
	logging-data="131067"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19NiGlc7tzks6rWi2PsAnZhoCwjdifn4i4="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+B9iTshclFy1m0fwYujklYTYV/0=
In-Reply-To: <FI_BP.79967$J3s7.19381@fx05.iad>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 4691

On 3/17/2025 3:27 PM, cyclintom wrote:
> On Mon Mar 17 07:58:42 2025 zen cycle  wrote:
>> On 3/16/2025 1:01 PM, cyclintom wrote:
>>> On Sat Mar 15 08:09:38 2025 John B.  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Just out of curiosity, what does a "productive engineer" do?
>>>> -- 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> For one thing, he actually knows what engineering is.
>>
>> that leaves you out, mr. "pwm is used to test cables".
>>
>>> Remember when Liebermann and
>>> Flunky demanded me to "prove" I was an engineer by showing how many patents I had?
>>
>> I don't remember jeff ever asking for your patents, he may have.
>>
>> I've never asked for your patents. There's no need. The blindingly
>> ignorant statements you make are more than enough for me to know that
>> you were never an engineer.
>>
>>>
>>> They might as well asked you to prove how important your were in the same manner. Crew Chiefs were an integral part of a team to maintain the airworthiness of an aircraft But that had to be said about every member in the chain.
>>>
>>> We can saythat you could outline evertything you did in a day, but from Flunky we get nothing but generalizations.
>>
>> Want some detail? sure. One of the tasks I'm currently leading are lab
>> tests on a new product to document thermal characteristics of intrinsic
>> safety protective components on Zone 0 outputs under both internal and
>> external fault conditions of the new product we're releasing. The math
>> shows we're within the safety margins but it's close enough that the
>> regulatory agency wants empirical data.
>>
>> I'm also running the root cause failure analysis (technical segment of
>> an 8D analysis) on some customer returns that all exhibited the same
>> failure within a few days of each other. The Intrinsic Safety protection
>> resistors on one output sensor drive channel literally burned out (same
>> channel on 4 units). This is a failure that has never been recorded in
>> the 40+ year history of the product (current customer installed base of
>> nearly 50,000 units), so we're doubtful it's a design flaw, but need to
>> prove it.
>>
>> Another nagging issue is working with the Firmware engineer to mitigate
>> bit error rates on a Maxim (formerly Dallas Semiconductor) 1-wire
>> communication protocol that needs to go through an Intrinsic Safety
>> barrier. The barrier inherently pushes the electrical tolerance limits
>> for error free communication, but we're hamstrung by the barrier
>> requirements, so we're working on a firmware solution.
>>
>> Then of course there are the numerous regulatory updates I deal with on
>> a regular basis, including my participation on a few technical
>> committees (one UL, two IEC) reviewing and updating various Hazard
>> Location standards.
>>
>> That's a snapshot of what a productive engineer does. They don't make
>> claims about PWM being use to test cables of that 'light lines' are a
>> common term for fiber optic data cables.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> You mindless dumbshit, 

said the magatard tool...

> you agreed with every word that Liebermann said 

He usually very-well reasoned with links and references to back up his 
claims. You might want to take notes.


> even when he was criticizing you

He may have called out a mistake I've made or something he disagreed 
with, but you mistake that for criticism (hint: it isn't).