Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vrbot9$2dj66$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: "E.Laureti" <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: With us to Mars
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 12:28:25 GMT
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 55
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <vrbot9$2dj66$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vr776g$2bul0$1@dont-email.me> <vr7tlm$2rjgb$8@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
	logging-data="25163"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: Newsgrouper/0.7.1
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:tcmyz82GbArFFXD3pp7yDyBHJNM=
Return-Path: <news@eternal-september.org>
X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
	id 7A29B22978C; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 08:28:39 -0400 (EDT)
	by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2479B229783
	for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 08:28:37 -0400 (EDT)
	by pi-dach.dorfdsl.de (8.18.1/8.18.1/Debian-6~bpo12+1) with ESMTPS id 52ICSSVj1112139
	(version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT)
	for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 13:28:28 +0100
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.eternal-september.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C10E8622AE
	for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 12:28:26 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: name/C10E8622AE; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=newsgrouper.org.invalid
	id 7CB1CDC01CA; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 13:28:26 +0100 (CET)
X-Injection-Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 13:28:26 +0100 (CET)
X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX19uYU4MZ0GsylkQQ1zJ6sXGUp/6lmHgs3Aw695vaciGpA==
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,
	RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,
	URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS,USER_IN_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
	smtp.eternal-september.org


JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> posted:

>   E.Laureti wrote:
> 
> > Only we can get to and from Mars with a human crew
> 
> I'd be satisfied with an automated return mission.
> 
> Think about it:
> 
> Humans can perform the work of a "Mars Rover" in a tiny fraction
> of the time. Humans walk *Oodles* fast than those damn things
> move. They cover a disappointingly small amount of ground. But...
> 
> They'd be stuck on their feet. They're not going to have a cart
> to drive around on, a 4-wheeler or anything. If that were possible
> why note just send a lander that size, with that speed and those
> capabilities? It would be infinitely easier and cheaper.
> 
> No food.
> No water.
> No humans.
> 
> Think of how much LESS weight, size & cost you'd need eliminating
> all that, and going with a robotic version!
> 
> Buzz around HUNDREDS of miles, maybe THOUSANDS instead of the 20
> that Curiosity managed over an entire DECADE!
> 
> Yes:  20 miles per decade!
> 
> A little less, actually. It took it just over 12 years to go less
> than 20.5 miles.
> 
> So humans can walk about 4 mph, call it 2 mph with all that gear,
> so two humans can cover the same ground in five hour.
> 
> Five hours compared to 12 years!
> 
> So you're not wrong. But the proverbial "Quantum Leap" could be
> achieved with a larger, faster, more capable rover.
> 
> We can build a vehicle that can cover 10 or 100 times the
> distance in a fraction of the time. And THAT is likely a far
> simpler and cheaper and safer than sending humans, AND it would
> be another step (more lessons) towards a really successful
> manned mission.
> 
> 

really i don't uderstand of what propulsion you speak.
It you want ... write here

https://www.tumblr.com/communities/pnnpropulsion