| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vrbot9$2dj66$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail From: "E.Laureti" <user2039@newsgrouper.org.invalid> Newsgroups: talk.origins Subject: Re: With us to Mars Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 12:28:25 GMT Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 55 Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org Message-ID: <vrbot9$2dj66$1@dont-email.me> References: <vr776g$2bul0$1@dont-email.me> <vr7tlm$2rjgb$8@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89"; logging-data="25163"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org" User-Agent: Newsgrouper/0.7.1 To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:tcmyz82GbArFFXD3pp7yDyBHJNM= Return-Path: <news@eternal-september.org> X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org id 7A29B22978C; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 08:28:39 -0400 (EDT) by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2479B229783 for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 08:28:37 -0400 (EDT) by pi-dach.dorfdsl.de (8.18.1/8.18.1/Debian-6~bpo12+1) with ESMTPS id 52ICSSVj1112139 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 13:28:28 +0100 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eternal-september.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C10E8622AE for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 12:28:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: name/C10E8622AE; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=newsgrouper.org.invalid id 7CB1CDC01CA; Tue, 18 Mar 2025 13:28:26 +0100 (CET) X-Injection-Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 13:28:26 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX19uYU4MZ0GsylkQQ1zJ6sXGUp/6lmHgs3Aw695vaciGpA== HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS,USER_IN_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 smtp.eternal-september.org JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> posted: > E.Laureti wrote: > > > Only we can get to and from Mars with a human crew > > I'd be satisfied with an automated return mission. > > Think about it: > > Humans can perform the work of a "Mars Rover" in a tiny fraction > of the time. Humans walk *Oodles* fast than those damn things > move. They cover a disappointingly small amount of ground. But... > > They'd be stuck on their feet. They're not going to have a cart > to drive around on, a 4-wheeler or anything. If that were possible > why note just send a lander that size, with that speed and those > capabilities? It would be infinitely easier and cheaper. > > No food. > No water. > No humans. > > Think of how much LESS weight, size & cost you'd need eliminating > all that, and going with a robotic version! > > Buzz around HUNDREDS of miles, maybe THOUSANDS instead of the 20 > that Curiosity managed over an entire DECADE! > > Yes: 20 miles per decade! > > A little less, actually. It took it just over 12 years to go less > than 20.5 miles. > > So humans can walk about 4 mph, call it 2 mph with all that gear, > so two humans can cover the same ground in five hour. > > Five hours compared to 12 years! > > So you're not wrong. But the proverbial "Quantum Leap" could be > achieved with a larger, faster, more capable rover. > > We can build a vehicle that can cover 10 or 100 times the > distance in a fraction of the time. And THAT is likely a far > simpler and cheaper and safer than sending humans, AND it would > be another step (more lessons) towards a really successful > manned mission. > > really i don't uderstand of what propulsion you speak. It you want ... write here https://www.tumblr.com/communities/pnnpropulsion